LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH versus K. VENKATA REDDY & OTHERS

Citation: [1976] 3 S.C.R. 929 · Decided: 26-03-1976 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: R.S. SARKARIA

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

• 
' 
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 
v. 
K. VEN.KATA REDDY & OTHERS 
March 26. 1976 
(R. S. SARKARJA AND P. N. SHINGHAL, JJ.] 
929 
. Evidence Act (l of 1872), s. 9-ldentification of accused a: test identifica-
tion parad(;:-Use of. 
' 
h Indian Penal Code (Act 45 of 1860), ss. 34 and 302-Conviction under 
w en named co-accused are acqulfted-When permissible. 
' 
Whe1~ the bus in which the deceased and P.Ws. 1 to 3 were travelling, 
alone with other passengers, halted at a bus stop, a number of persons sur-
roun~ed. the bus, ~orced all the passengers out of the bus except the deceased, 
and znfiicted multiple st!lbs on the 
deceased 
causing 
his 
death. Thirteen 
persons were charged with offences under s. 302, 34 and 149 I.P.C. The trial 
cc;>u-!1 convicted ~ome and acquitted the others. 
In appeals against the con-
v1~tion and acqmttal, the High Court acquitted all the accused. In appeal to 
this. Court against the acquittal of seven accused, including A-7, 
HELD: Confirmihg the acquittal of others, A-7 is guilty of an offence 
under s. 302, read with s. 34, I.P.C. 
( 1) The evidence of the intereited eye-witnesses PWs 2 and 3 was suffi-
ciently corroborated as against A-7 by the testimony of PWs 9 and 11 the 
conductor and driver of the bus. They had identified A~7 at an identification 
parade. It is true that while picking out this accused at the parade these 
witbesses did not say anything w1th regard to the specific part played by 
hin1 in the commission of the crime. That, however, does not render the 
evidence of such idenofication inadmissible. From the fact that P\V 9 while 
testifying as to the fact of identification was referring: to this ·accused as A-7 
in1pEes that he had identified him in court. He had in that connectioh eluci-
dated why he had picked out A-7 at the identification parade. The evidence 
given by the witness in court was substantive testimony, while the identifica-
tion made by him at the parade was confinnatory of that fact. 
As regards 
PvY' 11 his evidence was more clear. The Magistrate who held the parade 
had mixed up 12 other persohs at this parade with the four accused, includ-
ing A-7. It could not therefore be said that the number of other persons 
mixed with the accused was inadequate. [936H; 937F; 938B-F, G-H; 939C] 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
(2) The result is that excepting A-7, the participation of the other 12 
F 
named accused in the commission of the crime has not been established. There 
is also no evidence to show as to which of the assailants dealt the fatal blow 
on the deceased. The medical evidence, however, shows that there were hot 
less than 44 incised injuries including penetrating wounds upon the body of 
the deceased. The extremelv large number of injuries on the body of the 
-deceased lends assurance to the testimony of PWs 2 ahd 3 that the number of 
assailants was more than 13 including some unnamed and unidentified persons. 
Therefore, apart from the accused named in the charge, there \\''ere at least 
one or n1ore unidehtified person who participated in the fatal assault on the 
G 
deceased conjointly with A.7. 
A~7 can, therefore, be convicted under s. 302 
read with s. 34, l.P.C. [940B, G-941B] 
Maina Singh v. State of Rajasthan [1976] 3 SCR 651, followed. 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No. 155 
()f 1971. 
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 
31-7-70 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 
45/69 and Criminal Revision Case No. 391/ 69. 
H 
930 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(1976] 3 S.C.R. 
• 
A 
P. Ram Reddy and P. P. Rao for the Appellants. 
Govind Das, Mrs. Sunanda Bhandare, A. K. Mathur, A. K. Sharma 
"- ,. 
and M. S. Narasimhan for the Respondents. 
B 
c 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
SARKARIA, J .-This appeal by special leave is directed against a 
judgment of acquittal rendered by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 
The facts may now be stated. 
There are three villages, Konda Kala Vatala, Konda Papaya Palli 
and Govinda Palli situated at a short· distance from each other There 
were warring factions in these villages One was led by Vellugoti 
Pedda Eswara Reddy deceased and Mumagala Narayana Reddy, the 
Sarpanch of Konda Kala-Vatala. 
The rival faction was headed by 
Akkanunareddigari Venkata Kondareddy, Accused No. 1 (for short, -1 
A-1)_. There was bad bloq_d between the two factions. Both the fac-
tions were proceeded against under ss. 107 /151, Cr.P.C., also 
The deceased was a resident of Kon

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.