LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. versus NAVIN KUMAR SINHA

Citation: [2024] 11 S.C.R. 799 · Decided: 19-11-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ABHAY S. OKA · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · cites 4 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 11 S.C.R. 799 : 2024 INSC 874
State Bank of India & Ors. 
v. 
Navin Kumar Sinha
(Civil Appeal No. 1279 of 2024)
19 November 2024
[Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Issue arose as regards whether the Bank could have initiated 
disciplinary proceedings against the employee after his 
superannuation.
Headnotes†
Service law – Dismissal from service – Initiation of disciplinary 
proceeding post superannuation – Disciplinary proceeding, 
if void-ab-initio – Employee with the Bank, on completion of 
30 years was due to superannuate on 26.12.2003, however, 
was given extension until 01.10.2010  – In August 2009 
employee placed under suspension for irregularities and 
sanctioning loans in favour of his relatives in violation of 
banking norms and missing documents – In 2011 disciplinary 
proceedings initiated against the employee, and thereafter 
in 2012 penalty of dismissal from service imposed on him – 
Upheld by the appellate authority as also the reviewing 
authority – Writ petition thereagainst – Allowed by the 
High Court holding that bank had no jurisdiction to initiate 
disciplinary proceeding beyond 01.10.2010, thus, the order 
of penalty, as also the order of the appellate authority and 
reviewing authority set aside and quashed, and the Bank 
directed to extend consequential service benefits to the 
employee – Said order upheld by the Division Bench – 
Correctness:
Held: No disciplinary proceeding can be initiated after the delinquent 
employee or officer retires from service on attaining the age of 
superannuation or after the extended period of service – Departmental 
proceeding is ordinarily said to be initiated only when a chargesheet 
is issued – Charge memo was issued to the employee in 2011 after 
* Author
800
[2024] 11 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
his extension of service was over on 01.10.2010 – Employee was 
due to superannuate on 26.12.2003 apparently on completion of 
30 years of service but his service was extended, and the extended 
service of the employee came to an end on 01.10.2010 – Relationship 
of master and servant between the Bank and the employee came 
to be severed on and from 01.10.2010 – Factum of receipt of 
subsistence allowance thereafter or the employee declaring that he 
would superannuate on a later date i.e. on 30.10.2012 on attaining 
the age of 60 years would not make any difference to the legal 
and factual scenario – Thus, it is evident that employee was no 
longer in the service of the Bank post 01.10.2010 – Disciplinary 
proceeding against the employee was not initiated on 18.08.2009 
when the first notice to show cause was issued but was initiated 
only on 18.03.2011 when the disciplinary authority issued the 
charge memo to the employee – Subsisting disciplinary proceeding-
one initiated before superannuation of the delinquent officer may 
be continued post superannuation by creating a legal fiction of 
continuance of service of the delinquent officer for the purpose of 
conclusion of the disciplinary proceeding – Disciplinary proceeding, 
if initiated against an employee before he retires from service, 
could be continued and concluded even after his retirement and 
for the purpose of conclusion of the disciplinary proceeding, the 
employee is deemed to have continued in service but for no other 
purpose. [Paras 23, 24, 26, 28, 30-33]
Case Law Cited
SBI v. C.B. Dhall [1997] Supp. 6 SCR 416 : (1998) 2 SCC 544; 
UCO Bank v. Rajinder Lal Capoor [2007] 7 SCR 543 : (2007) 6 
SCC 694; UCO Bank v. M.B. Motwani [2023] 16 SCR 525 : (2023) 
SCC Online SC 1327; Union of India v. K.V. Jankiraman [1991] 
3 SCR 790 : (1991) 4 SCC 109; Coal India Ltd. v. Saroj Kumar 
Mishra [2007] 5 SCR 233 : (2007) 9 SCC 625; Canara Bank v. 
D.R.P. Sundharam (2016) 12 SCC 724 – referred to.
List of Acts
State Bank of India Act, 1955; State Bank of India Officers’ 
(Determination of Terms and Conditions of Service) Order, 1979; 
State Bank of India Officers’ Service Rules, 1992; State Bank of 
India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules, 1975.
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 
801
State Bank of India & Ors. v. Navin Kumar Sinha
List of Keywords
Dismissal from service; Initiation of disciplinary proceeding 
post superannuation; Disciplinary proceeding, if void-ab-initio; 
Suspension; Disciplinary proceeding; Penalty; Chargesheet; 
Jurisdiction; Relationship of master and servant; Subsistence 
allowance; Continuance of service; Extension of period of service.
Case Arising From
CIVIL

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.