LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

SRI PRASANTA KUMAR PAL & ORS versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

Citation: [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2606 · Decided: 08-04-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: RAJESH BINDAL, N KOTISWAR SINGH · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2606 : 2025 INSC 783
Sri Prasanta Kumar Pal & Ors. 
v. 
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
(Civil Appeal No. 5078 of 2025)
8 April 2025
[Rajesh Bindal and  
Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the observation of the Revenue Officer, as prima facie 
accepted by the High Court that the transaction of gift deed dated 
07.12.1967 was a Benami transaction is totally erroneous as the 
amendment (2nd and 3rd Amendment in the West Bengal Land 
Reforms Act, 1955) came into effect almost two decades after 
registered gift deed was executed.
Headnotes†
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 – 2nd Amendment (came 
into force on 07.08.1969) and 3rd Amendment (came into force 
on 12.05.1989) – s.14T(3) r/w ss.14M, 14T (8) & (9) & 14S – 
Determination of surplus land – The Revenue Officer vide 
order dated 16.06.1997 held that the gift deed executed on 
07.12.1967 (vide which 20.88Β½ acres of land was transferred) 
was a benami transaction – After adding the aforesaid area, 
surplus area was again redetermined – Tribunal set aside the 
order of the Revenue Officer – Aggrieved, the State preferred 
the writ petition, which was accepted by the High Court and 
the matter was remitted back – Correctness:
Held: The facts on record, which are not in dispute are that the 
aforesaid gift deed was executed by one ICP on 07.12.1967, gifting 
some part of his land holding to his three sons and three daughters, 
leaving substantial portion with him – When calculated in terms of 
the 1955 Act, an area of 8.80 acres was declared as surplus and 
the same vested in the State – The aforesaid registered gift deed 
dated 07.12.1967 was given effect to in the revenue records on 
26.05.1969 – It will be absurd to accept the argument that such 
a transaction can be held to be Benami with reference to an 
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 
2607
Sri Prasanta Kumar Pal & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
amendment carried in the 1955 Act with effect from 12.05.1989, 
as no one could possibly dream that the land holding had to be 
distributed amongst the family members to avoid it being declared 
as surplus on a later date – The genuineness of the registered gift 
deed executed on 07.12.1967 could not be put in question two 
decades later only because an amendment had been carried out 
in 1989 with retrospective effect – In the aforesaid factual matrix 
of the case, the High Court has committed an error in setting 
aside the order passed by the Tribunal by remitting the case for 
examination afresh as no two opinions could be formed on the 
basis of the facts. [Paras 12-14 and 16]
Case Law Cited
Mrinal Kanti Pal v. State of West Bengal, (2000) SCC OnLine Cal 
513 – referred to.
List of Acts
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955.
List of Keywords
Registered gift deed; Retrospective effect; Surplus land; Benami 
transaction; Remitted the matter back.
Case Arising From
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 5078  
of 2025
From the Judgment and Order dated 08.09.2021 of the High Court 
at Calcutta in WPLRT No. 31 of 2020
Appearances for Parties
Advs. for the Appellants:
Kalyan Banerjee, Sr. Adv., Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Gaurav 
Jain, Ms. Abha Jain.
Advs. for the Respondents:
Kalyan Banerjee, Sr. Adv., Gaurav Jain, Ms. Abha Jain,  
Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee.
2608
[2025] 4 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Order
1.	
Leave granted.
2.	
The appellants have filed the present appeal impugning the order 
dated 08.09.2021 passed by the High Court1 in a Writ Petition2. 
Vide aforesaid order, the High Court had set aside the order dated 
11.01.2019 passed by the Tribunal3 in Original Application No.452 
of 2008.
3.	
Briefly, the argument raised by the learned counsel appearing for the 
appellants is that one Iswar Chandra Pal had executed a registered 
gift deed dated 07.12.1967 in favour of his sons and daughters. Vide 
the aforesaid Gift Deed 20.88Β½ acres of land was transferred. The 
same was given effect to in the revenue records on 26.05.1969 and 
the land was transferred in the respective shares of the beneficiaries. 
Considering the balance land of the said Iswar Chandra Pal, the 
Government had declared 8.80 acres of land as surplus area and had 
taken possession thereof. Iswar Chandra Pal died in the year 1975. 
4.	
Subsequently, after the 2nd4 and 3rd5 Amendment in the West Bengal 
Land Reforms Act, 19556, proceedings7 under Section 14T(3) read 
with Sections 14M & 14S of the 1955 Act were

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.