LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER versus KARIGOWDA & ORS.

Citation: [2010] 5 S.C.R. 164 · Decided: 26-04-2010 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: R.V. RAVEENDRAN · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2010] 5 S.C.R. 164 
A 
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERยท 
ยท, v. 
KARIGOV'llDA & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 3838 of 2010 etc.) 
B 
APRIL 26, 2010 . 
,. . 
[R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] 
. Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 
',\\ 
c 
ss. 23 and 24 - Pair market value - Of acquired land -
In compulsive acquisition - Determination of - Grant of 
compensation - Held: For determining the market value, the 
relevant consideration would be the value of land with its 
peculiar advantages and disadvantages with reference to 
0 commercial value -
Other consequential right, legal or 
commercial, which remotely flows from.an agricultural activity 
will not be treated as a relevant consideration -
The 
computation of compensation has to be in terms of ss. 23 and 
24 - Only statutory benefits in terms of ss. 23 (1-A) and 23 
E (2) would be available to the claimant - Manufacture of silk 
which is the result of the silk worm fed by mulberry leaves is 
not an agricultural activity, but sericulture - This activity would 
fall in the domain of manufacturing 'and commercial activity 
and is not directly covered under s. 23. 
F 
ss. 23 and 24 - Interpretation of - Held: The court should 
apply the principle of literal or plain construction to these 
provisions - In view of the scheme of the Act, it will not be 
appropriate either to apply the rule of strict construction or too 
liberal construction to the provisions of the Act -Interpretation 
G of statutes. 
ss. 4 and 48 -
Land acquisition -
Land taken in 
possession prior to issuance of notification u/s. 4 - Grant of 
interest for the period prior to the notification - Held: Grant of 
H 
164 
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER v. 
165 
KARIGOWDA & ORS. 
interest for the period prior to notification not permissible -
A 
However, for such period, court can direct the Collector to 
examine the extent of rent or damage - s. 48 would come to 
the aid of claimants. 
Land Acquisition: 
B 
Compensation for land acquisition - Methodology for 
computation of - In compulsive acquisition - High Court 
adopting Capitalization of Net Income Method, negating the 
Sales Statistics Method by taking instances of adjacent 
villages adopted by the Land Acquisition Officer - Held: 
C 
ยท Adoption of method of Capitalization anq multiplying the 
same by 10, is without the support of.evidence, hence 
inconsequential - Sale instances of adjacent villages can be 
made basis for determining the fair market value - On facts, 
the instances considered by Land Acquisition Officer are 
D 
relevant instances - Claimants are entitled to increase at the 
rate of 15% P.A. compounded, in view of increasing trend in 
sale price and since the land was used for production of 
mulberry crops which had restrictive use in the manufacturing, 
commercial or industrial activities - The Court is entitled to 
E 
apply some reasonable guess work to balance the equities 
and fix just and fair market value in terms of parameters uls. 
23 of Land Acquisition Act - In the peculiar facts of the case, 
claimants are given higher compensation - What could be 
capitalized was the value of mulberry leaves used for 
F 
sericulture and not the value of silk cocoons -
Land 
Acquisition Act, 1894 - ss. 23 and 24. 
Compulsive acquisition -
Power of compulsive 
acquisition has an inbuilt duty and responsibility on the State 
to pay just and fair compensation without delay. 
G 
Interpretation of Statutes: 
Legislative intent - Held: Legislative intent needs to be 
noticed for beneficial and proper interpretation of the 
H 
' . 
166 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2010) 5 S.C.R. 
. A provisions in the light of the scheme underlying the provisions 
of the Statute. 
Literal/Plain construction - The plain words require no 
construction - However, whether the words are plain or 
8 
ambiguous can be determined by studying them in their 
context. 
Interpretation - Guiding principles - Held: Interpretation 
can be literal or functional - Literal interpretation not to go 
beyond litera legis - Functional interpretation can make some 
C deviation to the letter of law - The interpretation is best which 
makes the textual interpretation match the context - A statute 
is best interpretated when the purpose of enactment are 
known - Where statutory provision confers rights and also 
states mandatory or implied conditions, such conditions are 
D relevant for interpretation - Exercise of statutory power in 
breach of the express of implied conditions will be illegal, i

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.