SOOSAI ETC. versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B c D E F G H 242 SOOSAI ETC. v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS SEPIEMBER 30, 1985 [P.N. BHAGWATI C.J., R.S. PATHAK AND AMARENDRA NATH SEN, JJ.] Constitution of India 1950, Articles 14 to 17 and 341 o Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order 1950, Para 3. Persons belonging to Schedule Caste - Conversion to Christianity - Disentitlement to benefit of constitutional provisions relating to Schedule Castes - Whether legal, valid and constitutional. The Government of India set up a special Central Assistance Scheme for the welfare of Scheduled Castes. Consequent to a pro- posal under this Scheme, allotment of bunk free of cost were to be made to cobblers by profession who worked on the roadaide, by the State Government of Tamilnadu in pursuance to G.O. No. 580 Social Welfare Department dated February 13, 1982. This Order specifically stated that persons belonging to the Scheduled Caste& and converted to Christianity were not eligible for assis- tance under the scheme. The petitioner, who was a Hindu belonging to the Adi-ilravida caste and on conversion to Christianity continued as a member of that caste, contended in his writ petition to this court that he had been denied the benefit of the welfare assistance intended for Scheduled Castes on the ground that he professes the Christian religion, and that such discrimination had been affected pursuant to the provision contained in paragraph 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and that the provision was co.c:titutionally invalid as being violative of Articles 14 to 17. In the connected writ petition, relief was sought against the Circular letter dated August 16/25, 1983 issued by the State Government of Tamilnadu to the State Public Service Commission stating that "Scheduled Caste" Christians who revert to Hinduism and on that basis obtain appointments to reserved seats in Government services and having done so change their religion once ' oOOSAI v. u.u.1. 243 again after their entry into Government service were liable to have their selection cancelled, as being constitutionally invalid and violative of Articles 14 to 17. On the question: whether the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 is constitutionally invalid on the ground that only Hindu or Sikh members of the castes enumerated in the Schedule to that Order are deemed to be Scheduled Castes for the purpose of the Constitution of India. Dismissing the writ petitions, l:IKLll: 1. It is not possible to say that the President acted arbitrarily in the exercise of his judgment. in enacting paragraph 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. [250 F] 2. Dr. J.H. Hutton, a Census Commissioner of India, framed a list of the depressed classes and that list was made the basis of an order promulgated by the British Government in India called the Governme11t of India (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1936. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 was substantially modelled on the Order of 1936. The Order of 1936 enumerated several castes, races or tribes in an attached schedule and they were, by paragraph 2 of the Order, deemed to be Scheduled Castes. Paragraph 3 of the same Order declared that the Indian Christians would not be deemed to be members of the Scheduled Castes. [249 C-ilj 3. TheΒ· President had before him material indicating that the depressed classes of the Hindu and the Sikh Commun.Hies suffered from economic and social disabilities and cultural and educational backwardness so gross in character and degree that the members of these Castes iu the two communities called for the protection of the Constitutional provisions relating to the Scheduled Castes, and that in order to provide for their amelioration and advancement it was necessary to conceive of intervention by the State through its legislative and executive powers. [249 H; 250 BJ 4.(i) In discharge of the obligation imposed by clause (1) of Article 341 the PresidEnt issued the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. In its original form, paragraph 3 declared that "(l) no person who professes a religion different from Hinduism" would I><! deemed to be a member of a Scheduled Caste. There was a proviso to paragraph 3 which declared that every member of the Ramdasi, Kabirpanthi, Mazhabi or Sikligar caste A B. c D E F G H A Jl 244 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1985] SUPP.3 s.c.R resident in Punjab or the Patiala and East Punj
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex