LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

SITA DEVI WD/O MUKAND LAL versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

Citation: [1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 325 · Decided: 07-12-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

SITA DEVI WD/O MUKAND LAL 
A .. ยท 
v. 
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. 
DECEMBER 7, 1995 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.] 
B 
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 : 
Ss.23(1), 23(1-A), 23(2), 2S-Acquisition of lanli-Compensa-
tion-Solatium-Award made by Collector on 26.11.1976 and by reference C 
court on 10.1.1985-Held, land owner entitled to benefits under the ss.23(2) 
and 28, but not to benefits under ss.23(1) and 23(1-A). 
The appellant filed the appeal against the judgment of the High 
Court in the case arising out of the award of the Collector dated 26.11.1976 
and the reference court dated 10.1.1985. 
D 
Disposing of the appeal, this Court 
HELD : The appellant is entitled under s.23(2) of the Land Acquisiยท 
tion Act, 1894 to solatium at 30 per cent on enhanced compensation, and 
interest at 9 per cent on enhanced compensation for one year from the date E 
of taking possession of the land and 15 per cent thereafter till the date of 
deposit into Court. But she not entitled to adjust interest and solatium 
from the principal amount of compensation determined under s.23(1) and 
deposited on the respective dates. She is neither entitled to interest on 
solatium nor to additional amount under s.23(1-A). [326-D-E; C-D] 
F 
Prem NaJh Kapoor & Ors. v. National Fertilizers Corporation Ltd. & 
Ors., [1996] 2 SCC 71, relied on. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 11932 of 
1995. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 20.2.90 of the Punjab & 
Haryana High Court in C.R. No. 2651 of 1989. 
S.M. Ashri for the Appellant. 
Mrs. Sheela Goel and AK. Goel for the Respondents. 
325 
G 
H 
326 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 
A 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
Leave granted. 
The award of the Collector under Section 11 is of the Land Acquisi-
tion Act, 1894 is dated November 26, 1976. The award of the reference ยท 
B 
Court under Section 26 is dated January 10, 1985. Therefore, the appellant 
is entitled to the payment of enhanced interest and solatium under Sections 
28 and 23(2). The controversy raised in this matter is covered by the recent 
judgment of this Court delivered on November 29, 1995 [C.A. @ SLP 
8494/87] in Prem Nath Kapoor & Ors. v. National Fertilizers Corporation Ltd. 
& Ors. 
c 
In other respects, the appellant is not entitled to adjust interest and 
solatium from the principal amount of compensation determined under 
Section 23(1) and deposited on the respective dates. He is also not entitled 
to interest on solatium. Equally, the appellant is not entitled to additional 
D 
amount under Section 23(1-A) at 12 cent per annum from the date of 
notification till date of award or of taking over possession, whichever is 
earlier. The appellant is entitled under Section 23(2) to solatium at 30 per 
cent on enhanced compensation. Equally, the appellant is entitled to 
interest at 9 per cent on enhanced compensation for one year from the 
date of taking possession of the land and 15 per cent thereafter till date of 
E deposit into court. 
Appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs.