LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

SINDHI EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR. versus THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation: [2010] 8 S.C.R. 81 · Decided: 08-07-2010 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.S. CHAUHAN · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Cited by 4 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2010) 8 S.C.R. 81 
SINDHI EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR. 
v. 
THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & 
ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 5489 of 2007) 
JULY 8, 2010 
ยท [DR. B.S. CHAUHAN AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] 
Education/Educational Institutions: 
Minority institutions - School run by a linguistic minority 
- Receiving grant-in-aid - Circular issued by Education 
Department of Delhi Government in September 1989 to all 
A 
B 
c 
the schools that appointment of scheduled castes and 
schedule Tribes candidates was a precondition for all the 
0 
institution receiving grant-in-aid from Government in terms of 
r.64 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - HELD: Rule 
64(1 )(b) and the Circular of September 1989 are not 
enforceable against linguistic minority schools in NCT of 
Delhi - Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - r.64(1)(b) -
E 
Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - ss. 20,21, 28(2). 
Delhi School Education Rules, 1973: 
r.64(1)(b) - Undertaking to be given by a school for grant-
in-aid to fill in the posts in the school with the Scheduled 
F 
Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates - HELD: Is not 
enforceable against linguistic minority schools in NCT of 
Delhi - The object and purpose of the DSE Act is to improve 
the standard and management of school education and 
protection to minority schools - Rules must fall within the 
G 
ambit and scope of principal legislation - If r. 64(1 )(b) is 
enforced against minority schools, it would adversely affect 
and dilute the protection available to. minority school under 
the Act and the Constitution - Delhi School Education Act, 
81 
H 
82 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(2010] 8 S.C.R. 
A 1973 - s.21- Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 15, 
16(2), 29 and 30(2) - Interpretation of Statutes - Purposive 
interpretation - Doctrine of purposive advancement. 
B 
c 
Delhi School Education Act, 1973: 
s.2(o) -
'Minority school' - School run by Sindhi 
Education Society - HELD: Is a linguistic minority school in 
NCT of Delhi - Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 -
r.64(1)(b). 
CONSTITUTION OF /NOIA, 1950 
Articles 14, 15, 29 and 30(2) - Minority Institutions -
Grant-in-aid -
School run by Sindhi Education Society -
HELD: The Society enjoys the status of a linguistic minority 
0 and the school being a minority institution is entitled to all 
constitutional benefits and protection under Articles 29 and 
30 - To receive grant-in-aid is a legitimate right of a school 
subject to satisfying the requirement of law - Article 30(2) 
requires the State not to discriminate the minority institution 
in relation to matters of grant-in-aid - Delhi School Education 
E Rules, 1973 - r.64(1)(b). 
Articles 15, 29 and 30 - Linguistic minority - Right to 
establish and administer school - HELD: Includes right to 
appoint teachers - To appoint a teacher is part of the regular 
F edministration and management of the school - A linguistic 
minority is entitled to conserve its language and culture by a 
constitutional mandate - A provision of law or a circular which 
would be enforced against the general class may not be 
enforceable with the same rigors against minority institutions, 
G particularly, where it relates ,to establishment and 
management of a school - Rule 64(1)(b) of DSE Rules, if 
enforced, would adversely affect and dilute the right and 
protection available to minority school under the Constitution 
- Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - r.64(1)(b). 
H 
Articles 14, 15(5), 16, 29 and 30(1) - Reservation policy 
SINDHI EDUCATION SOCIETY v. CHIEF SECRETARY, 
83 
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 
- Exception in regard to minority institutions -
HELD: 
A 
Although State is entitled to make law and reservations in 
different fields for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and 
backward classes in the service under the State, but Article 
15(5) carves out an exception for minority educational 
institutions in regard to which the said power cannot be 
B 
exercised. 
Articles 12, 14 and 16 - "State" - ReservatiOn in relation 
to 'service under the State' - Linguistic minority school run 
by a society registered under Societies Registration Act -
C 
Receiving grant-in-aid - HELD: The expression 'service 
under the State' would include service directly under the State 
or its instrumentalities which can be termed as State within 
the meaning of Article 12 - In order to bring a society, 
organization or body within the expressions 'State' or 'other 
authorities' appearing in Article 12, financial control, 
D 
manag

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.