SHRI BINOD KUMAR SINGH versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 521 : 2025 INSC 154 Shri Binod Kumar Singh v. National Insurance Company Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 2214 of 2025) 07 February 2025 [B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma,* JJ.] Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission disallowing the insurance claim of the appellant. Headnotes† Insurance – Insurance claim – Entitlement – Valid National permit – Non-depositing of authorization fee – Truck of the appellant, insured with the respondent-insurance company, caught fire during the insurance period – Direction by the State Commission to the respondent to settle the claim on non-standard basis – However, the National Commission held that the insurance claim cannot be allowed in the absence of any valid permit and set aside the order passed by the State Commission – Correctness: Held: National permit was valid – Authorization fee was required to be paid only when the truck was moving out of State of Bihar as it was registered in the State of Bihar and the truck caught fire in the State of Bihar itself, thus, the respondent company could not have repudiated the claim on such a frivolous ground – Permit was issued by the competent authority in Bihar, thus, no requirement of paying authorization fee when the truck was being used in the State of Bihar – As per the terms and conditions of the National Permit, authorization fee was required to be paid only when the truck was moving out of State of Bihar – Thus, the apellant entitled for the insurance claim as held by the State Commission – Order passed by the National Commission set aside – Appellant not only entitled for the entire claim amount right from the date it became due but also entitled for interest @ 9% per annum from the date * Author 522 [2025] 2 S.C.R. Digital Supreme Court Reports of the complaint made before State Commission till the date, the amount is actually paid to him. [Paras 8, 9] Case Law Cited National Insurance Company v. Nitin Khandelwal, Criminal Appeal No. 8463/2014; Amrit Paul Singh and Anr. v. TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. (2018) 7 SCC 558 – referred to. List of Acts Insurance; Authorization fee; Validity of insurance cover; Non-standard basis; National permit; State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission; National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission; Insurance claim; Valid National permit; Non-depositing of authorization fee; Insurance period; Non-standard basis; Absence of valid permit; Repudiation of claim; Interest. List of Keywords Compounding of offence; Compounding application; First offence; Actual date of filing of return of income; Due date for filing of returns; Subsequent furnishing of return of income by assessee; Failure to furnish returns of income; “Voluntary disclosure”; Guidelines for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2014; Guidelines for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2008; Guidelines for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2019; Guidelines for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2022; Delay in filing return. Case Arising From CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 2214 of 2025 From the Judgment and Order dated 19.08.2020 of the National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in FA No. 1778 of 2017 Appearances for Parties Neeraj Shekhar, Mrs. Kshama Sharma, Rajesh Maurya, Ram Bachhan Choudhary, Amrendra Singh, Ms. Priya Chakraborty, Ujjwal Ashutosh, Advs. for the Appellant. Amit Kumar Singh, Ms. K Enatoli Sema, Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Prang Newmai, Advs. for the Respondent. [2025] 2 S.C.R. 523 Shri Binod Kumar Singh v. National Insurance Company Ltd. Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court Judgment Satish Chandra Sharma, J. 1. Leave Granted. 2. The present appeal is arising out of order dated 19.08.2020 passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, (for short, “the National Commission”) in First Appeal No. 1778 of 2017. 3. The facts of the case reveal that the appellant before this Court is the owner of Truck bearing registration No. BR-02-Q9220 make TATA- 251625.0LPKTC. The truck was insured with the respondent National Insurance Company for a period of one year i.e. from 18.09.2013 to the midnight of 17.09.2014 and unfortunately, the truck caught fire on account of short-circuit on 08.06.2014 meaning thereby during the validity of insurance cover. 4. The appellant preferred a c
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex