LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SHREE SURAT VALSAD JILLA K.M.G. PARISHAD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation: [2007] 6 S.C.R. 257 · Decided: 09-05-2007 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.B. SINHA · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

SHREE SURAT VALSAD JILLA K.M.G. PARISHAD 
A 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 
MAY09, 2007 
[S.B. SINHA AND MARKANDEY KA TJU, JJ.] 
B 
Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950-Schedule I-Amendment 
of Schedule-Excluding sub-caste'Mochi' outside Dang District and Umargaon 
Taluka of Va/sad District of Gujarat-Validity of-Held: Amendment is valid- C 
The Order of 1950 is exhaustive-It is not for the court to render its opinion 
regarding decision of President in confining inclusion of the Caste 'Mochi' 
within a particular area-Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order 2nd 
Amendment, 2002-Constitution of India, 1950-Article 341-Judicial Review. 
Public Distribution-Dealership in Petroleum products-Reserved for D 
Scheduled castes candidate-Allotment of-To the candidate belonging to 
'Mochi' caste-By amendment to Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950 
caste 'Mochi' excluded from the Schedule-Validity of allotment-Held: 
Dealership liable to be cancelled in view of the amendment-Constitution 
(Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950. 
By Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order 2nd Amendment, 2002, 
'Mochis' outside the Dang District and Umargaon Taluka ofValsad District 
E 
in the State of Gujarat were excluded from Schedule I to the Constitution 
(Scheduled Caste) Order 1950. A Notification to that effect issued by Central 
Government was adopted by State of Gujarat by a Resolution dated 18.2.2003. 
The amendment and the resolutions were challenged and the High Court F 
upheld the validity thereof. Hence, the two appeals. 
Third appeal pertains to grant of dealership in petroleum products. The 
dealership reserved for Scheduled Caste candidate was allotted to the 
appellant, who belonged to sub-category of 'Mochi'. Allotment was challenged G 
in view of the resolution dated 8.2.2003 excluding the sub-caste from Schedule 
I to the Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950. High Court cancelled 
the dealership allotted to the appellant. 
257 
H 
258 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2007] 6 S.C.R. 
A 
Dismissing the appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1.1. The Constitution provides for declaration of certain castes 
and tribes as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in terms of Articles 
341 and 342 of the Constitution of India. The object of the said provisions 
is to provide for grant of protection to the backward class of citizens who are 
B specified in the Scheduled Castes Order and Scheduled Tribes Order having 
regard to the economic and educationally backwardness wherefrom they 
suffer. The President of India alone in terms of Article 341 (1) of the 
Constitution of India is authorized to issue an appropriate notification 
therefore. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 made in terms 
of Article 341 (1) is exhaustive. It is, therefore, not for the court to render 
C its opinion as to whether the President was correct in confining inclusion of 
the caste Mochi within a particular area. Thus, no case has been made out 
for declaring the impugned legislation as unconstitutional. 
(Para 9, 10 and 11) (262-E, F, G) 
1.2. It cannot be said that the superior courts should exercise a wider 
D power in respect of such a matter in view of the fact that the legislative power 
of the Parliament under Article 341 (2) of the Constitution of India is of 
special nature and not plenary. (Para 6) (261-A) 
1.3. By reason of Article 341, the Constitution authorized the President 
to specify the castes, race or tribes or parts of or groups within castes, races 
E or tribes which shall for the purposes thereof be deemed to be Scheduled 
Castes in relation to that State or Union Territory by public notification. Such 
notification issued under Clause (1) shall not be varied by any subsequent 
notification as provided by Clause (2) of Article 341 except by the President. 
As and when States were formed, the President had power to issue notification 
as for that State such notification would not be a variation of the existing 
F notification, but a fresh notification which could, after its issuance, n-0t be 
varied by the President. It provides for a composite scheme. The modalities 
for issuance of public notification under Article 341 have been prescribed to 
enable the President to exercise his power in relation to a State wherefor 
consultation with the Governor is required to be done. Scheduled Castes are 
G specified for the purpose of the Constitution. If power can be exercised not 
only for a caste or a part of group within the caste, it can also incl

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.