LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

SHEIKH JAVED IQBAL @ ASHFAQ ANSARI @ JAVED ANSARI versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation: [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1054 · Decided: 18-07-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.B. PARDIWALA · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1054 : 2024 INSC 534
Sheikh Javed Iqbal @ Ashfaq Ansari @ Javed Ansari 
v. 
State of Uttar Pradesh
(Criminal Appeal No. 2790 of 2024)
18 July 2024 
[J.B. Pardiwala and Ujjal Bhuyan,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, 
an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities 
(Prevention) Act 1967 and Penal Code, 1860 who had been in 
custody for more than nine years.
Headnotes†
Bail – Denial – When not justified – Constitution of India – 
Article 21 – Right to speedy trial – Serious charges no ground 
to deny bail – Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 –  
SS.16, 43D – Penal Code, 1860 – SS. 489B, 489C – Fake 
counterfeit Indian currency notes seized from the appellant-
accused, a foreign national – In custody as an under-trial 
prisoner for nine years – Bail denied:
Held: An accused or an undertrial has a fundamental right to speedy 
trial traceable to Article 21 – If the alleged offence is a serious 
one, it is all the more necessary for the prosecution to ensure that 
the trial is concluded expeditiously – When a trial gets prolonged, 
it is not open to the prosecution to oppose bail of the accused-
undertrial on the ground that the charges are very serious – Bail 
cannot be denied only on the ground that the charges are very 
serious though there is no end in sight for the trial to conclude – 
In the present case, the appellant has been in custody for more 
than nine years – Trial likely to take considerable time as only 
two witnesses have been examined – Impugned order of the High 
Court set aside and quashed – Appellant granted bail subject to 
the conditions stipulated. [Paras 22, 34]
Penal Statutes – Statutory restrictions – Constitution of India – 
Article 21 – Infringement – Duty of constitutional court:
* Author
[2024] 7 S.C.R. 
1055
Sheikh Javed Iqbal @ Ashfaq Ansari @ Javed Ansari v.  
State of Uttar Pradesh
Held: Right to life and personal liberty enshrined under Article 
21 is overarching and sacrosanct – A constitutional court cannot 
be restrained from granting bail to an accused on account of 
restrictive statutory provisions in a penal statute if it finds that 
the right of the accused-undertrial under Article 21 has been 
infringed – In that event, such statutory restrictions would not 
come in the way – Even in the case of interpretation of a penal 
statute, howsoever stringent it may be, a constitutional court has 
to lean in favour of constitutionalism and the rule of law of which 
liberty is an intrinsic part – In the given facts of a particular case, 
a constitutional court may decline to grant bail – But it would be 
very wrong to say that under a particular statute, bail cannot be 
granted. [Para 32]
Bail – Denial of bail to an undertrial – Judgment in NIA v. 
Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali reported as [2019] 5 SCR 1060 
not a precedent to deny bail to an undertrial:
Held: Decision in Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali has to be read and 
understood in the context in which it was rendered and not as 
a precedent to deny bail to an accused-undertrial suffering long 
incarceration with no end in sight of the criminal trial. [Para 28]
Case Law Cited
Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab [2024] 2 SCR 134 : (2024) 
SCC Online SC 109 – distinguished.
NIA v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali [2019] 5 SCR 1060 : (2019) 
5 SCC 1 – explained.
Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb (2021) SCC Online SC 50; Javed 
Gulam Nabi Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra [Criminal Appeal 
No. 2787 of 2024] – relied on.
Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial 
Prisoners) v. Union of India [1994] Supp. 4 SCR 386 : (1994) 6 
SCC 731; Shaheen Welfare Association v. Union of India [1996] 2 
SCR 1123 : (1996) 2 SCC 616; Angela Harish Sontakke v. State of 
Maharashtra (2021) 3 SCC 723; Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control 
Bureau, Criminal Appeal No. 2814-15 of 2024 – referred to.
List of Acts
Constitution of India; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; 
Penal Code, 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
1056
[2024] 7 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Bail; Bail denied; Fake counterfeit currency notes seized; 
Under-Β trial prisoner; Long incarceration; Prolonged trial; ArticleΒ 21 
of the Constitution of India; Speedy trial; Fundamental right 
of accused to speedy trial; Serious offence; Serious charges; 
Right to life and personal liberty; Restrictive statutory provisions;  
Penal statute; Constitutional court; Constitutionalism; Rule

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.