LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

SHEETAL SHANKAR SALVI AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation: [2017] 2 S.C.R. 939 · Decided: 27-03-2017 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.A. BOBDE, L. NAGESWARA RAO · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2017] 2 S.C.R. 939 
SHEETAL SHANKAR SALVI AND ANR. 
A 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 
ยท--""-rยท 
(Writ Petition (Civil) No. f74 of2017) 
MARCH 27, 2017 
[S. A. BOBDE AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.] 
Constitution of India - Art.2I - Personal liberty - Woman :S 
right to make reproductive choices - Medical termination of 
pregnancy-Petitioner no.} into her 27 weeks of pregnancy- Fetus 
diagnosed with Arnold Clwiri malformation Type 2 with meningo 
myelocele with tethered cord - Report of Medical Board stating 
that the mother :S physical condition was normal and there was no 
phys_ical risk to the mother, due to continuation or termination of 
pregnancy but she was anxious about outcome of pregnancy; the 
fetus had severe physical anomalies which would compromise post 
natal quality of life and the child would suffer severe physical and 
mental morbidity on survival and the baby may be born alive and 
may survive for variable period of time - Writ petition by petitioner 
. no. 1 seeking directions to the respondents to allow her to undergo 
medical termination of pregnancy - Held: Apparently, it was not 
possible for the said Medical Board to determine the period of time 
for which the baby was likely to survive - It also appeared from the 
report of Medical Board that the baby was not likely to survive 1ike 
a normal baby - However, in view of the fact that there was no 
danger to the mothers life and the likelihood that the baby may be 
born alive and may survive for variable period of time, in the interests 
of justice it is considered inappropriate to allow the prayer of 
petitioner no. l - In fact, the Medical Board itself had stated that it 
did not advise medical termination of pregnancy for petitioner no. l 
011 medical grounds - Permission to te~minate the life of the fetus, 
ther('.fore, not wanted. 
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 
174of2017. 
Under Article 32 or the Constitution oflndia. 
939 
B 
c 
D 
E 
G 
H 
940 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[20 l 7] 2 S.C.R. 
A 
Sneha Mukherjee, Satya Mitra, Advs. for the Petitioners. 
B 
c 
D 
E 
Ranjit Kumar, SG, Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, G. S. Makker, Nishant 
R. Katneshwarker, Arpit Rai, Advs. for the Respondents. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered 
ORDER 
1. Petitioner No. I - Sheetal Shankar Salvi, has approached this 
Court under Article 32 of the Constitution oflndia seeking directions to 
the respondents to allow her to undergo medical termination of her 
pregnancy. 
2. By order dated 22.3.2017, while issuing notice to the 
respondents, this Court gave a direction for examination of petitioner 
no. I by a Medical Board consisting of the following seven Doctors: 
I. Dr. Avinash N. Supe, Director (Medical Education & Major 
Hospitals) & Dean (G&K) - Chairman 
2. Dr. Shubhangi Parkar, Professor and HOD, Psychiatry, KEM 
Hospital 
3. Dr.Amar Pazare, professor and HOD, Medicine, KEM Hosptial 
4. Dr. Indrani Hemantkumar Chincholi, Professor and HOD, 
Anaesthesia, KEM Hospital 
5. Dr. Y.S. Nandanwar, Professor and HOD, Obstetrics, KEM 
Hospitals 
F 
6. Dr. Anahita Chauhan, Professor and Unit Head, Obstetrics & 
Gynecology, LTMMC and LTMG Hospitals 
7. Dr. Hemangini Thakkar, Addi. Professor, Radiology, KEM 
Hospital. 
ยท 
3. Petitioner No. I is into her 27 weeks of pregnancy. This is also 
G 
borne by the medical report dated 25.3.2017, received from the Dean & 
Director (ME & MH)'s Office, Seth G.S. Medical College & KEM 
Hospital, Pare!, Mumbai - 400012. 
H 
4. It is not in dispute that the fetus of petitioner no. I has been 
diagnosed with polyhydramnios with Arnold Chairi malformation Type 2 
SHEETAL SHANKAR SALVI AND ANR. v. UNION OF !NOIA 
941. 
AND ORS. 
severe hydrocephalus with lumbosacral meningo myelocele and spina 
A 
bifida with tethered cord. 
5. The Medical Board has submitted its report dated 25.3.2017. 
On perusal of the said report, we find that the said report contains the 
following significant features for the purposes of passing this order : 
(I) The diagnosis of Arnold Chairi malformation Type 2 with 
meningo myelocele with tethered cord has been made on the basis 
ofultrasonography. 
B 
(2) The mother's physical condition _is normal and there is no 
physical risk to the mother, due to continuation or termination of 
C 
pregnancy. But she is anxious about outcome of pregnancy. 
(3) The fetus has severe physical anomalies which will compromise 
post natal quality of life and the child will have severe physical 
and mental morbidity

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.