LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SHAGUN MAHILA UDYOGIK SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Citation: [2011] 13 S.C.R. 789 · Decided: 19-08-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ALTAMAS KABIR · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2011] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 789 
SHAGUN MAHILA UDYOGIK SAHAKARI SANSTHA 
A 
MARYADIT 
v. 
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No.7104 of 2011) 
AUGUST 19, 2011 
B 
[ALTAMAS KABIR AND SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, JJ.] 
Government Contracts - Tender - Eligibility criteria -
Supply of food under Supplementary Nutrition Programme of C 
Integrated Child Development Scheme (!CDS) - Central 
Government revised nutritional and feeding norms which 
required the food to be fortified with essential micro nutrients 
- Extrusion technology was required to produce such food -
In response, respondent-State took out Expression of Interest D 
(EOI) for supply of fortified blended food manufactured 
through process of extrusion - Contract granted to respondent 
Nos.4 to 6 - Challenge to - Writ petition filed by appellant 
dismissed by the High Court - On appeal, held. The writ 
petition was rightly dismissed by the High Court - The EOI 
E 
had deliberately stressed on the need of precise 
measurements for preparation of the food - The food was to 
be prepared in the manner prescribed by the Government for 
safety and nutrient composition of the food - It could not be 
left to uncertainties of the machinery available with individual 
F 
manufacturers - The procedure adopted was necessary to 
ensure that there was "zero infection" in the food - Since the 
beneficiaries were infants from the age group of 6 months to 
3 years and pregnant and lactating mothers, it was all the 
more desirable to have fully automated plants and thus avoid 
G 
the use of human hands in processes like- handling, 
cleaning, grinding, extrusion and mixing -
Such 
considerations were not extraneous to the purpose for which 
the EOI was floated -
The condition in EOI of asking for 
789 
H 
790 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 13 (ADDL) S.C R 
A minimum Rs. 1 crore turnover for the last three years was also 
not arbitrary -
The appellant failed to satisfy the eligibility 
criteria as contained in Clause 6 of the EOI which required 
that the tenderer should have produced the specified food for 
the last three consecutive years and supplied the same to 
B Anganwadi's in /CDS - Since the appellant did not possess 
a suitable manufacturing unit, it was ineligible on this score 
alone - The appellant was not eligible at all to be even 
considered in the tender process. 
C 
In the year 1975, the Central Government floated a 
scheme termed as "Integrated Child Development 
Scheme" (ICDS) in order to improve the health and 
nutrition status of the children (between the age group 
of 0-6 years) and pregnant and lactating women, by 
providing them with supplementary food. Under the 
D Scheme, c.ertain kind of specified food was proposed to 
be supplied through Anganwadi Centres (AWCS). 
Apparent lack of progress in implementation of the 
aforesaid Scheme prompted the Peoples Union for Civil 
Liberties (PUCL) to move this Court by way of a Writ 
E Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, whereafter 
by a series of orders passed in the aforesaid writ 
proceedings, this Court issued necessary directions. 
Pursuant to the directions, respondent Nos.1 and 2 
F passed a resolution which provided for a detailed 
procedure of making available "Ready to Eat" ('RTE') 
food targeted to beneficiaries through Anganwadis. The 
food was to be supplied by Mahila Mandal, Mahila 
Sanstha, Women Self Helping Saving Groups, Sale 
G Assistant Saving Group for Anganwadis. 
H , 
Subsequently, in 2009, the Central Government 
revised the nutritional and feeding norms for 
supplementary nutrition in ICDS Scheme. The revised 
SHAGUN MAHILA UDYOGIK SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT 791 
v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 
norms required that the supplementary food be fortified 
A 
with essential micro nutrients with 50% of RDA level per 
beneficiary per day. The Central Government thereafter 
circulated the Recipe to the Maharashtra State 
Government (respondent No.1) as per new norms of ICDS 
for preparation of the food. It was provided that the 
B 
feeding ncrms ought to have two components in it, to be 
provided as supplementary nutrition to the beneficiaries 
at Anganwadi Centres (AWCS) namely:- Hot Cooked 
Meal (HCM) and Take Home Ration (THR). Directions were 
issued that HCM and THR should be given in the form of c 
"energy dense food I micro nutrient fortified food" and 
the food be processed by using Extrusion Technology. 
It was further emphasised that since the revised 
guidelines laid major stress on micro

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.