SH. BABU LAL, CONVENOR AND ANR. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITIEE AND ANR.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A SH. BABU LAL, CONVENOR AND ANR. v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITIEE AND ANR. JULY 13, 1994 B (KULDIP SINGH AND S.C. AGARWAL, JJ.] Service Law : Equal pay for equal work-New Delhi Municipal Com- mittee-Storm Water Drains Beldars and Storm Water Drains Mates-Claim for pay scale on par with other class-IV employees of the Committee who are C similarly situated and doing similar work-Held entitled to the same pay scale but prospectively. Constitution of India, 1950: Articles 14, 16, 39( df--Equal pay for equal work-New Delhi Municipal Committee-Storm Water Drains Beldars and Storm Water Drains Mates-Claim for parity in pay and allowances on par D with other Class-IV employees similarly situated and doing similar work-Held·entitled to. The petitioners, Clas•·IV employees, working as Storm Water Drains Beldars (SWD Beldars) and Storm Water Drains Mates (SWD E Mates) under the Respondent Committee claimed that they were entilltd to the pay scales recommended by the Shiv Shanker Committee for the technical staff of Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DESU) and made applicable to the other employees of the Respondent Committee more particularly the class-IV employees, who are similarly situated, doing same or similar work and belong to the same similar cadres. F ·Allowing the writ petition, this Court HELD : 1.1. The action of the NDMC in denying the SS Committee pay scales to the petitioners Is arbitrary, discriminatory and Is violative G or Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. [583-E-F] 1.2. It Is no doubt correct that the SS Committee did not make any recommendation In respect of class-IV employees of the NDMC. The SS Committee made Its recommendations only In respect of the technical staff of DESU but the NDMC on its own extended the SS Committee pay-scales H not only to the ministerial staff but also to class-IV employees working in 576 BABU LAL v. N.D.M.C. [KULDIP SINGH, J.) 577 Its electricity wing. [580-F] A l.3. A "Beldar" Is essentially a Safal Karamchari. There are beldars under different nomenclature In the service of the NMDC. Beldars, Sewer· man and Sweepers. by whatever name they may be called are part of the sanitary staff of the NDMC. They all belong to class-IV service and there can be no jnstlficatlon in classifying some of them for better treatment. B [581-A] R.D. Gupta & Ors. etc. v. Lt. Governor, Delhi Administration & Ors. etc. [1987] 3 S.C.R. 808 and Narendra Kumar & Anr. v. Lt Governor, Delhi Administration & Ors., W.P. (C) No. 3 of 1990, relied on. 2. NDMC and the Deihl Administration are directed to grant the .benefit of SS Committee pay scales to the Storm Water Drain~ Beldars and Storm Water Drains Mates with effect from April, 1,1994. [583-G] ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 895 c ~~ D Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. R.C. Pathak for the Petitioners. S.B. Wad, R.K. Maheshwari and Vineet Maheshwar for the Respon- E dents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KULDIP SINGH, J. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitu- tion of India is sequel to the judgments of this Court in R.D. Gupta & Ors. F etc. v. Lt Governor, Delhi Administration & Ors. etc., [1987] 3 SCR 808 and Narendera Kumar & Anr. v. Lt. Governor, Delhi Administration & Ors., Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of the 1990 decided on March 17, 1993. The petition is on behalf of the Storm Water Drains Beldar (SWD Beldars) and Storm Water Drains Mates (SWD Mates) who are class IV employees in the service of the New Delhi Municipal Committee (NDMC). The short ques· G lion for our consideration is whether. the SWD Beldars and SWD Mates are entitled to the pay-scales recommended by the Shiv Shankar Commit· tee (the SS Committee)? The SS Committee pay-scales are claimed by the petitioners on the ground that the said pay-scales have already been granted to class IV employees of the NDMC who are similarly situated, H 578 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1994) SUPP.1 S.C.R. A doing the same/similar work and belong to the same/similar cadres. B c It is not necessary to go into the factual details as the same have been covered in R.D. Gupta's case and Narender Kumars' case (supra). The technical staff of the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DESU) were not satisfied with the pay-scales granted as a result of the recommendations of the Third Pay Commission and they demanded higher pay-scales. The Government, therefore, constit
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex