LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SATWANT SINGH SODHI versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

Citation: [1999] 2 S.C.R. 230 · Decided: 26-03-1999 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.S. ANAND · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
SA TW ANT SINGH SODHI 
v. 
STA TE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. 
MARCH 26, 1999 
B 
[DR. A.S. ANAND, CJ. ANDS. RAJENDRA BABU, J.] 
Arbitration Act, 1940 : 
Section 14-Award made and signed by the arbitrator-Award not 
C delivered or pronounced or filed in the Court-Whether award becomes 
final-Held, an award will be complete as soon as it is made and signed 
by the arbitrator. 
Interim Award-When it will have the effect of a complete award-
Whether it will have effect even after the final award is delivered-Held, 
D if the interim award is intended to finally determine the rights of the 
parties it will have the force of a complete award and will have effect even 
after the final award is delivered . 
E 
Words & Phrases- 'Interim Award '-Meaning of in the context of the 
Arbitration Act, 1940. 
Appellant entered into an agreement with the respondent regarding 
construction of High Level Bridge over River Ghaggar on Pehawa Road at 
Devigarh. Disputes arose between them in respect of certain claims made by 
the appellant and the matter was referred to arbitration pursuant to an order 
made by the court. The appellant submitted his claim before the Arbitrator 
F seeking an interim award in respect of Item No. 1. The Arbitrator made an 
interim award regarding Item No. 1 in favour of the appellant. Thereafter, 
the Arbitrator made another award in respect of all claims including Item 
No. 1. The appellant made an application under Section 14 of the Arbitration 
Act for making both the awards rule of the court which was allowed by the 
G trial court. The trial court held that the interim award in regard to Item No. 
1 should be made the rule of the court and Item No. 1 of the subsequent award 
shall merge in the interim award, and the second award should be made rule 
of the court except for Item No. 1 for ~hich the interim award had already 
been granted. Against the Judgment of the trial court, Respondent Nos. 1 
and 2 preferred an appeal before the High Court which was allowed by 
H holding that the interim award was not pronounced though it was made and 
230 
... 
--
S.S. SODHiv. STATE 
231 
signed by the Arbitrator and was open to correction and it was superseded A 
by the final award, and that the trial court fell in error in making the interim 
award the rule of the court. Against the Judgment of the High Court, the 
appellants have filed the present appeal. 
The contentions of the appellant were that on the award being made by 
the Arbitrator in so far as Item No. 1 was concerned it was not open to the B 
Arbitrator to revise the award made by him earlier as he had become functus 
officio with regard to that particular Item of the Claim; that the award was 
made and signed by the Arbitrator which made the award binding and merely 
because no notice was given to the parties it could not be held to be invalid 
and the notice to the parties could be postponed; and that the interim award C 
having been made and being final in character it was not open for modification 
or alteration except in terms as provided in Section 13 ( d) of the Act. 
Allowing the appeals, the Court 
HELD : 1. The question whether interim award is final to the extent 
it goes or has effect till the final award is delivered will depend upon the form D 
of the award. If the interim award is intended to have effect only so long as 
the final award is not delivered it will have the force of the interim award 
and it will cease to have effect after the final award is made. If, on the other 
hand, the interim award is intended to finally determine the rights of the 
parties it will have the force of a complete award and will have effect even E 
after the final award is delivered. The terms of the first award do not indicate 
that the same is of interim nature. The award was made after examining the 
oral and documentary evidence and after considering the arguments and 
counter arguments. [234-G] 
2. Section 14 of the Arbitration Act provides that when the arbitrator F 
or umpire has made his award, he shall sign it and shall give notice in 
writing to the parties of the making and signing thereof and of the amount 
of fees and charges payable in respect of the arbitration and award. In the 
language of the Section, an award will be c~mplete as soon as it is made and 
signed. Thus mere writing of an award would not amount to making of an G 
award. There can be no finality in the award except when it is signed because 
signing of the award gives legal effect t

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.