LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR.

Citation: [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1072 · Decided: 13-02-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: M.M. SUNDRESH, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI · Disposal: Directions issued

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1072 : 2024 INSC 134
Satender Kumar Antil 
v. 
Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
MA No. 2034 of 2022 
In 
MA No.1849 of 2021 
In 
SLP (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021
13 February 2024
[M. M. Sundresh and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
The Amicus submitted report dated 10.02.2024 indicating the 
directions that have been complied with by the parties in terms of 
the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar 
Antil**. On basis of the said report, various directions are issued for 
due compliance by the States/Union Territories/CBI and High Courts.
Headnotes
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss. 41, 41A, 438, 440, 88, 
170, 204, 209, 436A – Supreme Court Directions – Compliance 
of directions by the States, Union Territories and CBI 
Requirement of:
Held: The directions contained in para 100.2, 100.4, 100.7 of 
Satender Kumar Antil and also the directions to public prosecutors 
in terms of order dated 21.03.2023 of the Supreme Court are 
required to be complied with by States, Union Territories and CBI 
as per the time schedule stipulated – So far as the directions in 
para 100.2, 100.3, 100.5, 100.6, 100.7, 100.8, 100.9, 100.10, 
100.11 of Satender Kumar Antil; the direction dated 03.02.2023 
for inclusion of the judgment in Siddharth v. State of UP and 
Satender Kumar Antil in the curriculum of judicial academies and 
the direction dated 21.03.2023 for application of the judgment in 
Satender Kumar Antil to s.438 of CrPC, by and large apply to High 
Courts. [Paras E and F]
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss. 41, 41A, 438, 440, 
88, 170, 204, 209, 436A – Supreme Court Directions – Details 
of directions to be complied with by the States, High Court, 
Union of India and CBI. [Para F, 1-38]
[2024] 2 S.C.R. 
1073
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
Directions by Supreme Court – Directions issued to NALSA:
Held: (i) In terms of the order dated 02.05.2023, NALSA shall 
supply updated information with regard to para 100.8 and 100.10 in 
Satender Kumar Antil; (ii) NALSA shall inform the follow-up action 
taken by NALSA and State Legal Services Authorities of the States 
and Union Territories as provided to NALSA by various authorities 
including the State governments and Union Territories; (iii) In order 
to provide to adequate updated information, all the States and 
Union Territories directed to cooperate with NALSA. [Para F, 39]
Directions by Supreme Court – Standard Operating Procedure 
(SOP) – Undertrial Prisoners – Convicted Prisoners:
Held: (i) A document titled “Guidelines and standard operating 
procedure for implementation of the scheme for support to poor 
prisoners” taken on record and made part of this Order; (ii) In 
furtherance of the subsequent orders passed by this Court on 
ancillary issues concerned with training public prosecutors and 
including judgments of this Court in the Curriculum of State Judicial 
Academies, a further direction on an SOP framed by Central 
Government need to be passed – The SOP if put in place by the 
Central Government, will indeed alleviate the situation of under 
trial prisoners by way of establishment of a dedicated empowered 
committee and funds etc.; (iii) For benefit of the under-trial prisoners, 
the SOP in its entirety is extracted in the present order. [Para I]
Directions by Supreme Court – E-mail ID:
Held: A dedicated email id to be created, so that the reports are 
saved or exchanged simultaneously – E-mail id to be used hereafter 
for serving and receiving affidavits/reports. [Para J]
Case Law Cited
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 
[2022] 10 SCR 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51**; Siddharth v. 
State of UP, (2022) 1 SCC 676; Arnesh Kumar v. State 
of Bihar and Anr., [2014] 8 SCR 128 : (2014) 8 SCC 
273 – referred to.
Books and Periodicals Cited
A document titled “Guidelines and standard operating 
procedure for implementation of the scheme for support 
to poor prisoners”.
1074
[2024] 2 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
List of Keywords
Supreme Court directions; Compliance of directions in Satender 
Kumar Antil case; Standard Operating Procedure; Undertial 
prisoners; Convicted prisoners.
Case Arising From
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : MA No.2034 of 2022
In
MA No.1849 of 2021
In
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.5191 of 2021
With
MA No.2035 of 2022 In Slp (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021
From the Judgment and Order dated 01.07.2021 of t

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.