LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

SANJAY MUSALE versus STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

Citation: [1998] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 646 · Decided: 17-09-1998 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.S. ANAND, B.N. KIRPAL, V.N. KHARE · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
SANJAY MUSALE 
v. 
ST ATE OF M.P. AND ORS. 
SEPTEMBER 17, 1998 
B 
[DR. AS. ANAND, B.N. KJRPAL AND V.N. KHARE, JJ.) 
Public Interest Litigation-Petitioner filing writ petition in High Cowt 
for another person concealing mate1ial facts-High Cowt dismissed the peti-
tion-Held, there is no public ti1terest involved in the petition---Cowts cannot 
C allow their f 0111111 to be misused in the garb of ''public interest". 
CIVIL APPELLATE .JURISDICTION: Petition for Special Leave 
to Appeal Civil No. 15971/98. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 27.3.98 of the Madhya Pradesh 
D High Court in W.P. No. 943 of 1997. 
ยท Shiv Sagar Tiwari for the Petitioner. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
E 
Delay condoned. 
The writ petition filed in the High Court by the petitioner concealed 
material facts as is noticed in the impugned order. The petitioner appears 
to have filed the litigation for someone. There is no public interest involved 
in the petition. The High Court rightly found him to be a busy body and, 
F 
in our opinion, such a meddlesome interloper cannot be permitted to 
maintain Public Interest Litigation Petition. The courts cannot allow their 
forum to be misused in the garb of "public interest". This special leave 
petition is, therefore, dismissed with Rs.5,000 as costs. 
R.P. 
Petition dismissed. 
646