LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SANGARABOINA SREENU versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

Citation: [1997] 3 S.C.R. 957 · Decided: 23-04-1997 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: M.K. MUKHERJEE, S.P. KURDUKAR · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

SANGARABOINA SREENU 
A 
v. 
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 
APRIL 23, 1997 
[M.K. MUKHERJEE AND S.P. KURDUKAR, JJ.] 
B 
Criminal Law : 
Penal Code, 1860 : 
Ss. 302, 306-Accused charged with murder of his wife-Trial Court C 
convicting him for murder-High Court setting aside the conviction u/s 302 
but convicting him under s.306-Held, offence under s.306 cannot be said to 
be a minor offence in relation to an offence under s.302 !PC as these two 
offences are of distinct and different categories-Hence conviction under s.306 
set aside-Code of Criminal Procedure, S.222. 
D 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 
182 of 1990. 
From the J udgmcnt and Order dated 16.8.89 of the Andhra Pradesh 
High Court in Crl. No. 382 of 1989. 
E 
A. Subba Rao for the Appellant. 
G. Prabhakar for the Respondent. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
The appellant was put up for trial before the Sessions Judge, Waran-
gal for uxoricide. The accusation against him was that on May 15, 1987 at 
or about 9.30 p.m. he poured kerosene oil on the body of his wife and set 
her on fire. The trial Court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC 
F 
but in the appeal preferred by him the High Court set aside his above G 
conviction and convicted him under Section 306 IPC. The above judgment 
of the High Court is under challenge in this appeal. 
This appeal must succeed for the simple reason that having acquitted 
the appellant of the charge under Section 302 IPC - which was the only 
charge framed against him - the High Court could not have convicted him H 
957 
958 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(1997] 3 S.C.R. 
A of the offence under Section 306 IPC. It is true that Section 222 Cr.P.C. 
entitles a Court to convict a person of an offence which is minor in 
comparison to the one for which he is tried but Section 306 IPC cannot be 
said to be a minor offence in relation to an offence under Section 302 IPC 
within the meaning of Section 222 Cr.P.C. for the two offences are of 
B distinct and different categories. While the basic constituent of an offence 
under Section 302 IPC is homicidal death those of Section 306 IPC are 
suicidal death and abetment thereof. 
For the foregoing reason the appeal is allowed and the conviction of 
the appellant under Section 306 IPC is set aside. The appellant, who is on 
C bail, is discharged from his bail bonds. 
G.N. 
Appeal allowed.