LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

SAHIL BHARGAVA & ORS. versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

Citation: [2024] 9 S.C.R. 408 · Decided: 09-09-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 9 S.C.R. 408 : 2024 INSC 699
Sahil Bhargava & Ors.  
v. 
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. 
(Special Leave Petition (C) No. 19953 of 2024)
09 September, 2024
[Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI,  
J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Issue arose as regards the fixation of the fee for the undergraduate 
medical degree course offered by college.
Headnotes†
Education/Educational Institutions – Medical admission – 
Undergraduate medical degree course – Fixation of fee – 
Students granted admission in 2018 to the medical UG course 
and completed the same in 2023 – At the time of admission, 
fee was Rs five lakhs p.a. for the All India quota seats and 
Rs four lakhs p.a. for the State quota seats subject to the 
final decision in the writ petitions pending before the High 
Court – In 2019, the fees revised for the academic years 2019-
2022 at Rs 13.22 lakhs p.a. for the All India quota and Rs 9.78 
lakhs p.a. for the State quota which was later charged for the 
academic year 2018-19 also – Writ petitions by the students 
seeking direction to the respondents to issue undergraduate 
degrees to them without insistence on any extra payment 
of tuition fee – High Court directed the students to deposit 
the fees in installments, and in the subsequent interim 
order directed that on the payment of the first installment, 
provisional certificate for completion of the course would be 
issued, and the students would be permitted to begin their 
internships – Challenge to, whereby, this Court permitted the 
students to continue the internship programme subject to 
deposit of two installments and the High Court to dispose of 
the pending writ petition expeditiously – Thereafter, the High 
Court admitted the writ petitions and posted the matter for 
March 2025, directing that subject to the deposit of the fee, 
original documents submitted by students to the university 
would be returned:
[2024] 9 S.C.R. 
409
Sahil Bhargava & Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. 
Held: Order of this Court sought to remove such an imbroglio by 
issuing a direction for the deposit of two installments of fees and 
requested the High Court to dispose of the petition – Instead of 
doing so, the High Court simply admitted the petition and posted 
it to March 2025 – No early resolution of the dispute seems 
likely – Students cannot be left in the lurch to an uncertain future – 
Students have paid approximately Rs 34 lakhs per student for 
the All-India quota seats and Rs 28 lakhs per student for the 
State quota seats, inclusive of the security deposit and remaining 
installments – In view thereof, students to be returned their original 
documents, to pursue their postgraduate studies and practice 
medicine, on the deposit of Rs 7.50 lakhs each over and above 
the amounts already deposited – Students to file an undertaking 
to pay the balance amount on the final disposal of the pending 
writ petitions – Interim order of the High Court modified in the 
said terms. [Paras 12-16]
List of Acts
Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions 
(Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act; Shri Guru Ram 
Rai University Act 2016
List of Keywords
Medical admission; Undergraduate medical degree course; 
Fixation of fee; Extra payment of tuition fee; Provisional certificate 
for completion of the course; Internships; Original documents 
submitted by students.
Case Arising From
EXTRA-ORDINARY CIVIL JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition 
(C) No. 19953 of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 06.08.2024 of the High Court 
of Uttarakhand at Nainital in WPMS No. 775 of 2023
Appearances for Parties
Gaurav Agrawal, Sr. Adv., Ms. Tanvi Dubey, Raghav Sabharwal, 
Mekala Ganesh Kumar Reddy, Aditya Nema, Advs. for the Petitioners.
Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv., Sagar Gaur, Ankit Shah, Dilip 
Annasaheb Taur, Advs. for the Respondents.
410
[2024] 9 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Order
1.	
The dispute in the present case relates to the fixation of the fee for 
the undergraduate medical degree course offered by a college 
in the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioners are students who 
were granted admission in 2018 to the undergraduate medical 
degree course administered by the third respondent - Shri Guru 
Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences College. The 
students completed the course in 2023. The second respondent 
is the Shri Guru Ram Rai University, a university governed by 
an

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.