LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RISHI ROOP POLYMERS PVT. LTD. versus DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND ADDL. SECRETARY AND ORS.

Citation: [2006] 3 S.C.R. 276 · Decided: 23-03-2006 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ASHOK BHAN · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
RISH I ROOP POLYMERS PVT. LTD. 
v. 
DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND ADDL. SECRETARY AND ORS. 
MARCH 23, 2006 
[ASHOK BHAN AND G.P. MA THUR, JJ.] 
Customs Tariff Act 1975-Schedule /, Sub-headings 3903.90 and 
4002.19-Anti-dumping Dut)i on Foreign Articles-Interference by Tribunal-
C Scope of--Designated Authority (DA) initiating anti-dumping investigation 
concerning import of SBR classified under Tariff Entry 4002.19 and 
recommending imposition of anti-dumping duty thereon-Government issuing 
a notification imposing duty-DA recording a firm finding that SBR falling 
under heading 3903. 90 not covered for the purpose of imposing duty-Held, 
Tribunal erred in holding on its own motion that DA wanted to impose duty 
D on all grades of SBR falling under sub-heading 4002 or 3903 --Tribunal's 
finding that anti-dumping duty leviable on SBR falling under sub-heading 
3903, set aside. 
Respondent 3 filed an Anti Dumping Petition before the Designated 
Authority (DA) against the imports of SBR alleging therein that the import 
E of SBR from the subject countries was causing injury to the domestic 
industry manufacturing SBR in India. He furnished details regarding the 
normal value of the products in the subject countries and the margin of 
dumping. DA initiated anti dumping investigation against the subject 
countries concerning imports of SBR classified under custom sub-heading 
F 4002.19 of schedule I during 1.4.1996 to 31.8.1997. DA ultimately 
recommended imposition of anti dumping duty. Government accepted the 
findings and issued a notification imposing anti dumping duty on import 
of SBR falling under Tariff Entry 4002.19. 
Appellant's appeals to the Tribunal were rejected except to the extent 
G of holding that variable anti-dumping duty greater than the dumping 
margin not be imposed. However Tribunal opined that a fixed duty on all 
grades of SBR falling under sub-heading 4002.19 as well as 3903.90 be 
imposed as confining of imposition of anti-dumping duty by DA only to 
SBR falling under Heading 4002.19 was a clerical omission requiring 
correction. 
H 
276 
-
RISHIROOP POLYMERS PVT. LTD. r. DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND ADDI. SECTY 
277 
Appellant preferred appeals to this Court. 
Party allowing the appeals, the Court 
HELD: I. Having gone through the confidential records produced 
before the Court and the data for the years 1995-96 and 1996-97 the court 
A 
was satisfied that the domestic industry suffered drastic decline in all the B 
relevant parameters during the period of investigation compared to those 
of the immediately preceding Financial Year 1995-96. The Court found 
no justification to take a view other than what had been taken by the 
Designated Authority and the Tribunal. Accordingly, the findings recorded 
by the Designated Authority as well as by the Tribunal on this point are C 
confirmed. (282-C-D) 
2. Tribunal after noticing the observations of the Designated 
Authority in para 7 of its order held that the Designated Authority wanted 
to impose anti-dumping duty on all grades of SBR irrespective of whether 
it fell under heading 39.03 or 40.02. However the findings recorded by D 
the Designated Authority in para 7 of its order clearly indicate that the 
Designated Authority did not intend to cover SBR which was being 
imported under sub-heading 3903.90 for the purpose of imposing duty; 
what the Designated Authority held was, that if the goods were being 
imported by wrongly classifying them under sub-heading 4002.19, then 
the Customs Authorities are at liberty and expected to classify the goods E 
correctly. It was held by the Designated Authority that while giving the 
import statistics. Respondent No. 3 had submitted information in respect 
of Custom Heading 4002.19 only; that Chapter 39 covers "Plastic and 
Articles thereof" whereas Chapter 40 covers "Rubber and Articles 
thereof' Styrene Butadiene Rubber, as the name suggests, is a synthetic F 
rubber and would be covered under Chapter 40 and not 39; that as per 
note no. 2(h) of Chapter 39, synthetic rubbers and articles thereof, which 
are covered under Chapter 40, do not fall under Chapter 39. The 
Designated Authority had recorded a firm finding that "Elastomer Resin 
KHS 68" was not covered for the purpose of imposing duty. The finding 
recorded by the designated authority was categorical and not a clerical G 
omission, as has been observed by the Tribunal. It was not correct on the 
part of the Tribunal to hold on its own motion that "t

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.