LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RATNA SUGAR MILLS CO. LTD. versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Citation: [1976] 3 S.C.R. 1062 · Decided: 07-04-1976 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: HANS RAJ KHANNA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
D 
1062 
RATNA SUGAR MILLS CO. LTD. 
v. 
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS 
April 7, 1976 
(H. R. KHANNA AND P. K. GOSWAMI, JJ.] 
U.P. LargP Land Holdings Act, 1957, S. 2(15) "land", scope of. 
The appellant acquired some 1and in district Jaunpur 
for setting up a 
factory, but did not use the land for such purpose. Under the U.P. Large 
Land Holdings Act, 1957, he was required to pay 
holdings 
t<tx 
fCl'lr 
the 
assessment years 1365 to 1368 Fasli. The appellant's application u/s. 143 of 
the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Re;forms Act, for treating his land 
as industrial land was rejected by the Sub-Divisional Officer. On appeal, the 
Collector affirmed the order. In further appeal to the Commissioner, the ap-
pellant succeeded as regards the years 1365 and 1366 Fasli. The State :filec! 
revision petitions. Subsequently the Commissioner held that the appellant 
was liable to pay holdings tax for the years 1367 and 1368 Fasli. The appel-
lant also preferred revision application·s. 
The Board of Revenue decided all 
the revision petitions in favour of the State, holding that the appe11ant's land· 
":as "sirdari" and not bhumidari, and it could not be meant for industrial 
purposes. The appellant's petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution -were-
rejected by a Single Judge of the High Court on the ground that the disputed 
land constituted "land as defined in the Act, and that he was liable to pay 
the tax. 
On appeal, the Division Bench of the High Court affirmed the-
order. 
It ¥ias contended before this Court that the land is held for industrial 
purposes, and is not "land" under sec. 2(15) of the Act. 
Disn1issing the appeals, the Court, 
E 
HELD : 
The appellant holds the land as a sirdar. 
Permission to use the 
land in ouestion for industrial purposes was not granted. The word "landsn 
used in the Act is wide enough to include all lands whether agricultural or 
not. The appellant cannot escape liability for payment of holding tax by 
keeping the land in question uncultivated. [1065-G, 1066CD] 
F 
G 
H 
Raia Jagannath Baksh ·singli v. State of Utlar Pradesh and Another, [1963] 
I S.C.R. 220, referred to. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeals 
Nos. 
1076-
1079 of 1971. 
Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 
8th January, 1970 of the Allahabad High Court in special appeals 
Nos. 965 to 968 of 1964. 
V. M. Tarkunde. E. C. A11arwala 
and 
Miss Manik Tarkunde, 
for the appellant. 
G. N. Dikshit, Shivapujan Singh, advocate for O. P. Rana, for 
the respondents. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
KHANNA, J.-This judgment would dispose of four civil appeals 
Nos. I 076 to 1079 of 1971 which have been filed by special leave 
by Ratna Sugar Mills Ltd. against the judgment of Allahabad High 
Court affirming on appeal the decision of the learned single 
Judge 
' 
RATNA SUGARMILLS v. U.P. STATE (Khanna, J.) 
I 063 
whereby the appellant's four petitions under article 226 of the Cons-
titution of India to challenge the order dated December 18, 1963 of 
the Board of Revenue directing the levy of holding tax under 
the 
U.P. Large Land Holdings Act, 1957 (U.P. Act No. 31 oi 1957) 
(tereinafter referred to as the Act) on the land of the appellant 
for the assessment years 1365, 1366, 1367 and 1368 Fasli had been 
dismissed. 
In 1951 the appellant acquired land measuring 277.08 acres situ-
ated in village 
Argupur Kalan, 
tehsil Shahganj, 
district Jaunpur. 
According to the appellant, the said land was acquired for 
the 
purpose of setting up a factory for the production of paper and pulp. 
A 
B 
A licence was granted to the appellant in that connection. 
The 
appellant filed an application under section 143 of the U.P. Zamindari 
Abolition and Land Reforms Act for treating its land situated 
in 
C 
village Agrupur Kalan as industrial land. 
In the course of those pro-
, ceedings, the Tahsildar submitted a report on August 24, 1959 as 
~ under: 
;,/ 
"As regards Argupur Kalan the whole area is recorded 
as sirdari of Ratna Sugar Mills and they pay Rs. 1495/-
as annual land revenue. It is recorded in the Mills from 
D 
before Zamindari Abolition and Mills Authorities continue 
to pay the recorded land revenue to Government. The whole 
area is lying Banjir and lies on both the sides of the rail-
way line and Belwai Station. It has not at all been brought 
under cultivation nor the Mill has derived any benefit from 
it. It is really meant for industrial purposes but due to 
finan

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.