RAMJHAN GANI PALANI versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY AND ANR
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 1050 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 4 S.C.R. [2022] 4 S.C.R. 1050 1050 RAMJHAN GANI PALANI v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY AND ANR. (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8942 of 2021) APRIL 27, 2022 [N. V. RAMANA, CJI, KRISHNA MURARI AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ.] Bail: Regular bail β Denial of β Matter pertaining to seizure of huge quantity of Narcotics drug, Heroin near Port in Gujarat in a joint operation by the Indian Coast Guard and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence-DRI β Prosecution case that on receiving intelligence input, the DRI intercepted a Pakistani boat in the Indian territorial waters which was trying to escape β Seizure of bags containing narcotic substance, and the Captain of the boat admitted dumping some bags into the sea along with a satellite phone β Investigation revealed that narcotics were being clandestinely brought into Gujarat from Pakistan through the sea route β Detention of petitioner on a reasonable belief that he was the Indian recipient for the drug consignment brought into the Indian territory by the Pakistani Flag Ship β Bail application by petitioner β Denial of regular bail by the courts below β On appeal, held: There is sufficient material on record to deny the discretionary relief of bail to petitioner β Petitioner has been chargesheeted for a serious offence where the minimum punishment prescribed is of ten years β Thus, the impugned order not interfered with β Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 β ss. 2, 8, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29 and 32 (B) (e) β Penal Code, 1860 β ss. 120-B, 121-A & 122 β Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act,1967 β ss.17, 18, 18-B, 20. EXTRAORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 8942 of 2021. From the Judgment and Order dated 19.08.2021 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.808 of 2021. R. Basant, Azmat Hayat Amanullah, Nishant Awana, Devansh Malhotra, Ms. Nitya Sharma, Akshay Sahay, Advs. for the Petitioner. A B C D E F G H 1051 K. M. Nataraj, ASG, Subhranshu Padhi, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Vinayak Sharma, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Advs. for the Respondents. The Order of the Court was passed by HIMA KOHLI, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking special leave to appeal against the order dated 19th August, 2021, passed by the Gujarat High Court, dismissing the appeal preferred by him against the order dated 19th March, 2021, passed by the Special Judge, National Investigating Agency, Ahmedabad, whereby his bail application was rejected in a case registered originally by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence1 and subsequently taken over by the National Investigating Agency for offences under Sections 120-B, 121-A & 122 of the IPC, Sections 17, 18, 18-B, 20 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Sections 2, 8, 16, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29 and 32 (B) (e) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 19852, relating to seizure of 236.622 Kgs. of Narcotics drug, Heroin near Jakhau Port, Gujarat on 21st& 22nd May, 2019 in a joint operation by the Indian Coast Guard and DRI. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on receiving intelligence input, the DRI had intercepted a Pakistani boat in the Indian territorial waters which was trying to escape on 21st May, 2019. The Indian Coast Guard had chased and caught the Pakistani boat with one Captain and five crew members on board. The Captain had admitted to dumping some bags into the sea along with a satellite phone. 194 packets were retrieved from the seven bags containing a total quantity of 217.856 Kgs of narcotic substance, Heroin and were seized. Subsequently, 17 more packets of Heroin weighing 18.766 Kgs were also recovered from the coastal area near the location, thereby taking the total seized quantity of Heroin to 236.622 Kgs in 211 packets The investigation revealed that narcotics were being clandestinely brought into Gujarat from Pakistan through the sea route. During his interrogation, the Captain of the Pakistan Flag ship, βAl Madinaβ stated that delivery of the consignment of the narcotic drugs had to be made at a particular position on the sea for which a communication was to be sent on VHF to the Indian counterpart. Communication channel No. 8 was earmarked for this purpose on which 1 For short βthe DRIβ 2 For short βthe NDPS Actβ RAMJHAN GANI PALANI v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY AND ANR. A B C D E F G H 1052 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 4 S.C.R. he was to
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex