LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RAMESH BAGHEL versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & OTHERS

Citation: [2025] 1 S.C.R. 961 · Decided: 27-01-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.V. NAGARATHNA · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 1 S.C.R. 961 : 2025 INSC 109
Ramesh Baghel 
v. 
State of Chhattisgarh & Others
(Civil Appeal No. 1235 of 2025)
27 January 2025
[B.V. Nagarathna* and Satish Chandra Sharma,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
A plea of a Christian man to accord his father a decent burial in 
his own native village.
Headnotes†
Constitution of India – Arts.14 and 15 – Chhattisgarh Panchayat 
Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 – Chhattisgarh Gram Panchayat 
(Regulating Places for Disposal of Dead Bodies, Carcasses 
and other Offensive Matter) Rules, 1999 – Appellant herein is a 
christian and belongs to the New Apostolic Church – His family 
and ancestors were native residents of village Chhindwada, 
Chhattisgarh for generations and belonged to the Mahra caste 
or community – The appellant’s father, a pastor, passed away 
on 07.01.2025 – Appellant wished to accord his father a decent 
burial in his own native village – However, the burial was 
objected by the fellow villagers – Appellant received no aid 
from the State machinery – Appellant filed writ petition before 
the High Court – By the impugned order dated 09.01.2025, the 
High Court disposed of the writ petition by refusing to grant 
relief as prayed for the appellant:
Held: [Per Nagarathna, J.] (i) The appellant permitted to conduct 
the funeral rites of his father in his private agricultural land at village 
Chhindwada at the earliest; (ii) However, the appellant shall not 
take any advantage, legally or otherwise, for having been permitted 
to bury his father in his private land; (iii) Since the death of the 
appellant’s father has given rise to the unsavoury controversy 
regarding the place of burial, respondent Nos.3 to 9 directed to 
provide adequate security and protection to the appellant and 
his family to carry out the funeral rites of his father at his private 
* Author
962
[2025] 1 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
agricultural land at village Chhindwada at the earliest; (iv) The 
implementation of the aforesaid directions to be expedited; (v) The 
respondent-State and its local authorities directed to demarcate 
exclusive sites as grave yards for burial of Christians throughout 
the State in accordance with law; (vi) Although, by consensus, 
this Court has issued certain directions as per the Order of the 
Court, nevertheless, direction five above shall be complied with 
by the respondent-State and its authorities dehors the direction 
issued under Article 142 of the Constitution. [Para 1] [Per Satish 
Chandra Sharma, J.(dissenting)] (a) The Appellant and his 
family be provided with an appropriate site within the Designated 
Christian Burial Ground situated at village Karkapal for the burial 
of the Deceased's remains; (b) The Respondent State is directed 
to ensure that the Appellant and his family are provided with all 
ancillary logistical support for the purpose of transferring the 
remains of the Deceased from the mortuary at the Medical College 
situated at Jagdalpur to Designated Christian Burial Ground 
situated at village Karkapal; (c) The Respondent State to grant 
the Appellant and his family members adequate police protection 
which shall be reviewed by the concerned authorities after a period 
of 7 (seven) days; (d) The Respondent State to take adequate 
measures to ensure no public order incident takes place at either 
village Karkapal or village Chindwada; and (e) The Respondent 
State is directed to ensure that the burial of the remains of the 
Deceased takes place at the earliest – The Appellant and his 
family members are directed to cooperate with the authorities 
of the Respondent State who shall handle the situation with the 
sensitivity it deserves. [Para 2]
Constitution of India – Art.142 – Directions issued – Appellant, 
a Christian wished to accord his father (pastor) a decent burial 
in his own native village – However, the burial was objected 
by the fellow villagers:
Held: (Per Court) There is no consensus between the members 
of this Bench on the place of resting of the appellant’s father who 
died on 07.01.2025 – Bearing in mind the fact that the deceased 
has been kept in mortuary for the last three weeks since 07.01.2025 
and in order to accord an expeditious and dignified burial of the 
deceased, the following directions in exercise of powers under 
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: (i) The appellant to conduct 
the funeral rites and bury his deceased father at the burial ground 
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 
963
Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ot

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.