LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RAM PRAKASH SHARMA versus BABULAL IRLA (D) BY LRS. & OTHERS

Citation: [2011] 6 S.C.R. 757 · Decided: 12-05-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MARKANDEY KATJU, GYAN SUDHA MISRA · Disposal: IA disposed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

(2011) 6 S.C.R. 757 
. RAM PRAKASH SHARMA 
A 
" 
, 
• 
~· 
•• < • 
.. • ·. •.,:·. 
v. 
-eABULAL H~LA (0) BY LRS. & OTHERS 
' 
... "· 
· I.A. N0.3 OF 2011 
... 
_,._ : ; 
. 
. 
IN 
'CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5310 OF 2010 
B 
MAY 12, 2011 
[MARKANOEY KAT JU ANO GYAN SUOHA MISRA, JJ.] 
Rent Control and Eviction: 
Eviction matters - Time granted to tenant to vacate the 
tenanted premises - Premises not vacated within the time 
granted - Held: In such a case, the tenant should be evicted 
c 
by the policeforce, if he does not vacate the premises on his 0 
own ;;.. ::(~1i~nt::cal1li!e an application well in advance to seek 
. extenslo"tii;>ffi"?:~:·t<)vacate the premises . 
. .. <:·".~.·:~··«· .. 
Cl\/H.;':APPELLATE JURISDICTION : I.A. No. 3 of 2011 
., 
Civil Appeal No. 5310 of 2010. 
From the Judgment & Order dated 5.9.2008 of the High 
Cout of Judicature Jabalpur, Bench at Gwalior in Second 
E 
Appeal No. 285 of 2005. 
F 
Madhurima Bora (for Balaji Srinivasan) for the appellant. 
Rishi Maheshwari (for Shally Bhasin Maheshwari) for the 
Respondents. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered 
757 
G 
H 
... 
758 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2011) 6 S.C.R. 
A 
ORDER 
Taken on Board. 
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 
B 
In the facts and circumstances of the case, time to vacate 
the premises in question is extended till 31st August, 2011 and 
if the tenants do not vacate on or before the said date, they will 
be evicted by police force. 
C 
We further make it clear that when this Court allows the 
petition/appeal of the landlord or dismisses the petition/appeal 
of the tenant and grant some time to vacate the premises in 
question and if the tenant does not vacate within the time 
granted, the tenant shall be evicted by police force. This is a 
general direction we are passing because we are coming 
D across several cases where the tenants are not vacating the 
premises in question despite granting time by this Court or 
despite furnishing an undertaking to this Court with a result that 
the landlord has to initiate contempt 1roceedings or any other 
proceedings. Hence, we give a general direction that when 
E tenant's petition/appeal is dismissed and he is given time to 
vacate then on the expiry of that time, he will be evicted by police 
force if he does not vacate of his own. 
If any extension of time to vacate is desired, that 
F application should be filed well in advance. 
The Interlocutory Application is allowed accordingly. 
N.J. 
Interlocutory Application allowed.