LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RAM KISHAN (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS ETC. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Citation: [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2563 · Decided: 03-04-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 9 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2563 : 2025 INSC 441
Ram Kishan (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs Etc. 
v. 
State of Haryana & Ors.
(Civil Appeal No(s). 4772-4773 of 2025) 
03 April 2025
[B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the Appellants, landowners of Village Dharuhera, Haryana, 
whose lands were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, 
by a notification dated 12.12.2008 are entitled to compensation at 
a higher rate—on par with the compensation awarded for similarly 
situated lands in adjoining villages, acquired under a later notification 
dated 13.05.2010, where the compensation was enhanced vide 
judgments in BESCO and M/s Habitat Estates.
Headnotes†
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (LA Act) – Land acquired for 
development and utilization of institutional sector in Dharuhera 
village, Haryana – Market value determined by Land Acquisition 
Collector (LAC) challenged – Reference Court enhanced the 
compensation – High Court vide impugned judgment, for 
reasons different from those recorded by Reference Court, 
maintained award as ordered by Reference Court – Impugned 
judgment set aside – Reasoning given by High Court to rely 
only on one exemplar not satisfactory – Lands acquired in 
adjoining villages are comparable – Compensation enhanced – 
Principle of de-escalation applied – Appeals partly allowed.
Appellants’ land acquired for development and utilization of 
Institutional Sector 5A under the Haryana Urban Development 
Authority Act, 1977 in Dharuhera village in Haryana – Section 4, 
LA Act, notification issued on 12.12.2008 – Section 6, LA Act, 
declaration issued on 11.12.2009 – LAC determined market 
value at Rs. 21,00,000/- per acre – Appellants filed reference 
for appropriate enhancement under LA Act, Section 18 – 
Reference Court enhanced the compensation, relying on award 
in acquisition vide notification dated 13.05.2010 in adjoining 
village of Malpura for development of industrial sectors 15, 
16 and 17 of Dharuhera – Considering the difference of 17 
* Author
2564
[2025] 4 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
months in date of two notifications, Reference Court applied de-
escalation of 12% and awarded compensation of Rs. 55,71,010/- 
per acre – High Court in impugned judgment found that 
Reference Court erred in placing reliance on the award in 
Malpura village as no evidence to prove that the acquired 
land in village Malpura vide notification dated 13.05.2010 was 
comparable in its geographical location, valuation and other 
factors – Reference Court also faulted for not considering 
sale deeds produced by parties which reflected a price lesser 
than the amount offered by the LAC – High Court relied on 
one exemplar Exh. PW4/D dated 02.05.2006 and rejected the 
other sale deeds – Confirmed judgment of Reference Court 
for reasons different from the one adduced by the Reference 
Court – Aggrieved landowners filed Appeals:
Held: Lands of villages Malpura and Kapriwas acquired under the 
notification of 18.05.2010 and lands of Appellants herein acquired by 
notification of 12.12.2008 – Purpose of acquisition in both matters 
development and utilization for sectors in Dharuhera (institutional 
and industrial respectively) – Villages are adjoining – Acquired lands 
under notifications of 12.12.2008 and 13.05.2010 on two sides of the 
NH-8 Jaipur-Delhi Highway – Vast difference in prices in exemplar of 
sale deeds relied upon by the Appellants and the State – High Court 
rejected all, except Exh. PW4/D – Reasoning given by High Court 
to only rely on PW4/D not satisfactory – Reasoning given by High 
Court that no evidence to prove that the acquired lands in village 
Malpura was comparable with the then geographical location, and 
other factors of the Appellants’ lands bereft of merit – Map indicates 
the proximity of the lands – Reference Court rightly recorded that 
villages were adjoining and the acquisition was all part of development 
of sectors in Dharuhera – Reliance to be placed on the value of the 
land arrived at in BESCO wherein compensation awarded with respect 
to lands acquired in village Malpura vide notification dated 13.05.2010 
and village Kapriwas was enhanced – Rs. 1,49,14,975 per acre to 
be treated as base value for the Appellants’ lands – Appropriate 
percentage of de-escalation and appropriate reduction for change 
of land use charges to be provided for – De-escalation @ 12% p.a. 
for one year and for remaining five months an additional 6% on the 
base value – Ad

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.