LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RAKESH KUMAR CHARMAKAR & ORS. versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

Citation: [2025] 2 S.C.R. 252 · Decided: 30-01-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: VIKRAM NATH · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 2 S.C.R. 252 : 2025 INSC 136
Rakesh Kumar Charmakar & Ors. 
v. 
The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
(Civil Appeal No(s). 1303-1304 of 2025) 
31 January 2025
[Vikram Nath* and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the appellants were entitled to regular pay scale in light 
of the circular dated 10.05.1984 issued by the State.
Headnotes†
Service Law – Pay-scale – Appointment as temporary 
employees against vacant and sanctioned posts – Entitlement 
to regular pay – Issuance of circular by the Department 
conferring the benefit of revised pay-scale to employees 
completing three years after initially being recruited by the 
Selection Committee at district level and appointed by Collector 
as temporary employees on fixed wages – Purpose was making 
provision for temporary employees to avail benefit of regular 
pay-scale – Department later issued circular that candidates 
appointed on regular posts under the Special Recruitment 
Drive would be paid regular pay-scale of the concerned post – 
Appellants appointed under Special Recruitment Drive, against 
the vacant posts of part time Swachchkar at rates prescribed 
by the Collector – As regards, some of the part time sweepers 
appointed under Special Recruitment Drive, the High Court in 
Ram Naresh Prajapati’s case extended the benefit of regular 
pay-scale to the temporary employees appointed under special 
recruitment drive by Collector’s order, once they completed 
three years time period after appointment – Appellants 
submitted representations before the Competent Authority for 
grant of regular pay-scale in light of Ram Naresh Prajapati’s 
case, which were rejected – Writ petition thereagainst allowed 
by the Single Judge of the High Court, however, the Division 
Bench set aside the order – Correctness:
* Author
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 
253
Rakesh Kumar Charmakar & Ors. v.  
The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Held: Appellants are similarly situated as the petitioners in Ram 
Naresh Prajapati’s case – Petitioners in Ram Naresh Prajapati’s 
case were also appointed under Special Recruitment Drive, 
against the vacant posts, on temporary basis – Only factual 
distinction upheld by the Division Bench in the impugned order, 
is the subsequent appointment of those petitioners on sanctioned 
posts of Attendant, Bull-Attendant, Servant, etc. – This factual 
difference not enough to conclude that appellants are differently 
situated from Ram Naresh Prajapati’s case, because the appellants 
have sufficiently proven that they were employed on regular and 
sanctioned posts by their initial appointment orders – Appellants 
fulfil all the conditions stipulated in the Circular to grant revised 
pay-scale – Appellants were appointed on regular posts even 
though they were temporary – Provisions of the 1979 Rules and 
the Circular dated 10.05.1984 both fulfilled by the appellants and 
thus, entitled for regular pay scale – Division Bench of High Court 
erred in distinguishing the case of Ram Naresh Prajapati’s case 
from the present appeals – Additionally, Circular dated 07.10.2016 
extended the benefit of regular pay-scale to daily wagers – It would 
be unjust, unfair and arbitrary if such benefit is not extended to the 
appellants who were appointed as temporary employees against 
vacant and sanctioned posts – Even if the State denies the benefit 
of regular pay-scale after completing three years, the appellants 
shall be benefitted from this Circular dated 07.10.2016 as they were 
appointed initially as daily wagers at Collector’s rate – Single Judge 
of the High Court rightly granted the benefit of regular pay-scale to 
the appellants – Impugned order of the Division Bench set aside 
and that of the Single Judge upheld – M.P. Veterinary Department 
Contingency Paid Employees Recruitment & Conditions of Service 
Rules, 1979. [Paras 14, 15, 17, 18]
Case Law Cited
Ram Naresh Prajapati & Ors. v. State of M.P, Writ Appeal No. 
197 of 2016 dated 10.12.2021 by the Division Bench of M.P. 
High Court – approved. 
List of Acts
M.P. Veterinary Department Contingency Paid Employees 
Recruitment & Conditions of Service Rules, 1979.
254
[2025] 2 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Pay-scale; Temporary employment on regular posts; Entitlement 
to regular pay; Revised pay-scale; Selection Committee at 
district level; Temporary employees on fixed wages; Special 
Recruitment Drive; Vacant posts; Part time sweepers; Ram Naresh 
Prajapati’s case; Sanctioned posts

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.