LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

RAJUL MANOJ SHAH ALIAS RAJESHWARI RASIKLAL SHETH versus KIRANBHAI SHAKRABHAI PATEL & ANR.

Citation: [2025] 10 S.C.R. 152 · Decided: 12-09-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 4 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 10 S.C.R. 152 : 2025 INSC 1109
Rajul Manoj Shah Alias Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth 
v. 
Kiranbhai Shakrabhai Patel & Anr.
(Civil Appeal No. 11781 of 2025)
12 September 2025
[Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and  
Joymalya Bagchi, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the High Court was correct in reversing the order passed 
by the Civil Court dismissing the interlocutory application filed by 
respondent no.1 for amending the written statement and for filing 
a counter claim in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the 
appellant; and legality of institution of a counter claim against a 
co-defendant.
Headnotes
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order VIII, Rule 6A – Counter-
claim by defendant – Suit for declaration filed by the appellant 
against her sister-in-law-defendant no.1 seeking declaration 
that she has no right to transfer or deal with the suit property 
without her consent and to declare that the agreement to 
sell in favour of respondent No.1, as null and void – Death 
of defendant no.1 – Thereafter, Nazir of the Civil Court-
respondent No.2 was substituted and appointed as defendant 
no.1 – On 26.07.2021, respondent no.1 filed application seeking 
amendment of the written statement to file counter claim 
thereby praying for direction to respondent No.2 to accept 
remaining consideration and execute sale deed in respect 
of the said agreement to sell executed by defendant no.1 
and to partition the suit property – Trial court dismissed the 
application by holding that a counter claim not maintainable 
against the co-defendant – However, the High Court allowed 
the application of the respondent no.1 and permitted him to 
file counter claim – Correctness: 
Held: High Court erred in reversing the judgment of the trial court by 
permitting defendant no.2 to file a counter-claim against defendant 
* Author
[2025] 10 S.C.R. 
153
Rajul Manoj Shah Alias Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth v. 
Kiranbhai Shakrabhai Patel & Anr.
no.1 and not against the appellant – Relief of specific performance 
as sought to be raised by defendant no.2 cannot be set up by 
way of a counter-claim since the same is not directed against the 
appellant, but is instead directed solely against the co-defendant – 
Defendant no.2 disentitled to raise prayer of specific performance 
by way of counter-claim – Further, defendant no.2 however submits 
that he has not only claimed the relief of specific performance, but 
has also sought partition of suit property to separate the share 
he is entitled to under the agreement – Defendant no.2 must first 
establish a right of claim over the property, which is absent till he 
succeeds against the estate of defendant no.1 and only thereafter 
that the question of setting up a counter claim against appellant 
may arise – Issues were framed on 12.02.2019 and the application 
for counter claim was filed almost two years thereafter, in 2021 – 
Defendant no.2 is seeking specific performance of an agreement 
dated 21.10.2011, which provided execution of the sale deed within 
twelve months – Defendant no.2 did not take any action – In any 
event, the next course of action to seek execution of the sale 
deed arose immediately after January 2012 when the appellant 
instituted a suit seeking annulment of so-called agreement to sell – 
Defendant no.2 did nothing – Only after the death of his vendor in 
October 2013 and after framing of the issues in February 2019 that 
the defendant no.2 decided to file the application, only after nine 
years of the filing of the suit, which was two years after framing 
of the issues. [Paras 22, 23, 25, 27]
Case Law Cited
Rohit Singh & Ors. v. State of Bihar [2006] Supp. 7 SCR 278 : 
(2006) 12 SCC 734; Ashok Kumar Kalra v. Wing CDR. Surendra 
Agnihotri [2019] 17 SCR 214 : (2020) 2 SCC 394 – relied on.
Munishamappa v. M. Rama Reddy, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1701; 
Damodhar Narayan Sawale v. Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske [2023] 6 
SCR 175 : (2023) 19 SCC 175; Satyender v. Saroj [2022] 13 
SCR 342Β : (2022) 17 SCC 154; Jag Mohan Chawla v. Dera Radha 
Swami Satsang [1996] Supp. 2 SCR 509 : (1996) 4 SCC 699; 
Kishore Kumar Khaitan & Anr. v. Praveen Kumar Singh [2006] 2 
SCR 176Β : AIR 2006 SC 1474 – referred to.
List of Acts
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
154
[2025] 10 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Counter claim; Execution of the sale deed; Suit for declaration; 
Agreement to sell; Amend written statement; Specific performance; 
Right of claim.
Case Arising From

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.