LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RAJPAL versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Citation: [1995] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 481 · Decided: 20-11-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

RAJPAL 
A 
v. 
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. 
NOVEMBER 20, 1995 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.] 
B 
Service Law: 
Regulmisation-Similarly situated persons already regularised-Appel-
lant to be taken into se1vice and regularised-However, he will not be entitled C 
to back wages but shall get all other consequential benefits. 
In this appeal against the High Court's order, the appellant prayed 
for regularisation. 
Allowing the appeal, this Court 
HELD : 1. Since the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken 
into service and their services have been regularised, the appellant, who is 
the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position. On 
this special circumstances, he is also entitled to the same relief. [482-B] 
2. The respondents are directed to take the appellant int9 service 
within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order. 
But the appellant would not be entitled to the back-wages; he would, 
however, get all other consequential benefits. [ 482-C) 
D 
E 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 11401 of F 
1995. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 8.9.92 of the Punjab & Haryana 
High Court in RS.A. No. 1065 of 1992. 
S.M. Hooda, Mahinder Singh Dahiya for the Appellant. 
Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal and Ms. lndu Malhotra for the Respondents. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
Delay condoned. 
481 
G 
H 
A 
B 
482 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1995) SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 
Leave granted. 
In view of the order passed by this Court in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 3099-
3100/85 & batch, the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into 
service and their services have been regularised. Under these circumstan-
ces, since the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also 
stands in the same position, we think, on this special circumstances, he is 
also entitled to the same relief. 
The appeal is accordingly allowed. But the appellant would not be 
entitled to the back-wages; he would, however, get all other consequential 
C benefits. The respondents are directed to take the appellant into service 
within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order. 
G.N. 
Appeal allowed.