RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR. versus HARISH KUMAR PUROHIT AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR. v HARISH KUMAR PUROHIT AND ORS. APRIL I. 2003 B [SHl\!ARAJ V. PATIL AND ARIJIT PASAYAT, JJ.] Service law: Recruitment-Post of Munsif Magistrate-Vacancies ,;armarked for C general and reserved categories--Non-availability of certain number of candidates in reserved categories-Claim to fl/I the reserved category seats by general categwy candidates--High Court's direction to call general category candidates fi1r interview three times the number of posts assuming increase in the number of general category posts due to non-availability of reserved D catcgo1y candidates-However. further direction lo fl// up only earmarked vacancies in general category and to cany forward the reserved category vacancies--On appeal, he/d-h'igh Court's direction was self contradictory and it defied iogic--Rajasthan .Judicial Service Rules, 1955. E Precedent: Earlier decision of Division Bench holding the field-Subsequent Co- ordinate Bench doubting the decision-in such case the only course open is to refer the mailer to larger Bench-Judicial propriety. An advertisement to recrnit 116 munsif Magistrates was issued, out F of which S9, 24, 19 and 14 posts were for the General, OBC, SC and ST categories respectively. The candidates numbering three times the number of posts advertised in each category were eligible to be called for interview. Commission issued interview letters to 302 candidates out of which 189 candidates were called for the posts in General category. Respondents filed G writ petition before High Court seeking direction to consider more candidates from general category as per the posts available, on the ground that each of the respondents had qualified in the written examination; that H in case of non-availability of SC and ST candidates the available scats were to be filled up by candidates belonging to general category and hence the Commission had to call 210 1:andidates by treating the number of posts 206 l RAJAS THAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION v. H.K. PUROHIT 207 available in the general category to be 70 (i.e. 59 as originally fixed and A 11 on account of non-availability of candidates in SC and ST categories). High Court allowed the appeal directing the Commission to call not less than 210 candidates from the general category. However, it directed to fill up only 59 vacancies in the general category and carry forward the vacancies of Scheduled Tribes. B In appeal to this Court appellant- Service Commission contended that there was no automatic increase in the vacancies in the general category from 59 to 70; that the directions of the High Court are self- contradictory. It pointed out that results had been published and appointments had been made; that even if the directions of the High Court C to call 210 candidates for the interview would have been complied with, the writ petitioners would not have come within the zone of consideration; and that the High Court passing the impugned judgment did not consider previous judgment passed by another Division Bench of High Court wherein similar prayers were rejected. Interlocutory applicatiol)S were filed before this Court on the ground that the presence of applicants belonging fo the OBC and the women category would facilitate proper adjudication of the appeal. Allowing the appeal and dismissing the applications, the Court HELD: I. High Court was not correct in directing that 210 candidates should be called for the interview. The directions given by the High Court are contradictory in terms. Once it has been accepted by the High Court that it was open to the Government to decide as to whether the posts are to be de-reserved or to be carried forwarded, there was no basis to proceed on the assum.ption that they would be de-reserved, thereby making the number of posts available for the general category as 70. At D E F the completion of the written examinations, there were only 59 posts available for the general category. On a hypothetical basis that there is a possibility of increase in the number of posts in general category, candidates numbering three times the number of posts including assumed G inclusions had to be called, the High Court gave the direction which defies logic. 1212-A; 211-G, HI 2. A Division Bench dismissed an application containing identical prayers. By the impugned judgment, another Division Bench took a diametrically opposite view. It is no
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex