LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RAJAN PUROHIT & ORS. versus RAJASTHAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE & ORS.

Citation: [2012] 11 S.C.R. 299 · Decided: 30-08-2012 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. PATNAIK · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2012] 11 S.C.R. 299 
RAJAN PUROHIT & ORS. 
v. 
RAJASTHAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 8142 of 2011 Etc.) 
AUGUST 30, 2012 
[A.K. PATNAIK AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] 
Education/Educational Institutions: 
A 
B 
Admission - In Private unaided Medical College - State c 
Government decision to fill 85% of the MBBS seats through 
State Pre-Medical Test 2008 (RPMT-2008) - No agreement 
with the College to give admission on the basis of RPMT-
2008 - College filling 117of150 seats [i.e. 16 seats through 
PCPMT (exam conducted by Private Medical and Dental 0 
colleges of the State) and 101 seats on the basis of 10+2 
exam] - The admission challenged by RPMT-2008 wait list 
candidates claiming admission against 85% seats - Single 
Judge of the High Court setting aside the admission directing 
the college to fill up the seats by candidates in the RPMT-
2008 - Division Bench of the High Court upholding the order E 
of Single Judge - On appeal, held: There was no agreement 
by the college to admit on the basis of RPMT-2008 - The 
college could not have been directed to fill up its seats 
through RPMT-2008 - But the admission of 117 students was 
contrary to clause (2) of Regulation 5 of MCI Regulations - It 
F 
was also not within the right of the College, under Article 
19(1)(g) of Constitution as explained in *TMA Pai and **P. A 
lnamdar cases - Since the candidates admitted by the 
college were not at fault, in exercise of power u/Art. 142 of 
Constitution, direction not to disturb their admission -
G 
Direction is subject to the condition that the candidate would 
pay a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs - Penalty imposed on the College 
to surrender its 107 seats to State Government phase-wise 
not more than 10 seats in any academic year - Regulations 
299 
H 
300 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2012] 11 S.C.R. 
A on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 - Regulation 5(2) -
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 19(1)(g) and 142. 
Admission - In Medical College - College entering into 
consensual arrangement with State Government to fill 85% of 
8 
MBBS seats by the students allocated by competent authority 
- Filling the 85% seats in two rounds of counselling from 
allocated students - Residual 21 seats filled by college on 
its own (15 through Pre-Medical Test and 6 on the basis of 
10+2 examination) - In another case Pre-Medical Test 
C Candidates in waiting list challenging filling up of the above-
mentioned 6 seats wherein High Court did not disturb the 
admission of the 6 students and also directed admission to 
the petitioners therein - 21 students not allowed to appear in 
exam - Present writ petition by the 21 students - Single Judge 
of the High Court allowing petition of 15 students who were 
D admitted through Pre-Medical Test - But dismissing the 
petition of 6 students in view of order of Medical Council of 
India discharging the 6 students from the course - Order 
confirmed by Division Bench of High Court - On appeal, held: 
The Admission of the 6 students were in violation of 
E Regulation 5(2) of MCI Regulations - Regulation 5(1) is not 
applicable to State of Rajasthan because this State has many 
Boards/Universities/Examining Body - The present petition 
was also not barred by principle of res-judicata as the issue 
in the present petition was not the issue in the previous 
F petition - However, invoking powers under Article 142 of the 
Constitution, admission to 6 students not disturbed subject to 
the condition that they would pay Rs. 3 lakhs - Penalty 
imposed on the college to surrender the 6 seats to the State 
Government - Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 
G 1997 - Regulations 5(1) and (2) - Code of Civil Procedure, 
1908 - s. 11 - Principle of Res Judicata - Constitution of 
India, 1950 - Article 142. 
Civil Appeal Nos. 8142, 8143 and 8144 of 2011: 
H 
The medical college in question was a private 
RAJAN PUROHIT v. RAJASTHAN UNIVERSITY OF 
301 
HEALTH SCIENCE 
unaided non-minority college. It was yet to receive its 
A 
permission from the Government of India and affiliation 
from the Rajasthan University of Medical Sciences. 
Pursuant to a meeting regarding conducting of common 
entrance test for admission to Medical and Dental 
Colleges in the State of Rajasthan for the academic year 
B 
2008-2009, the college Chairman and Managing Trustee 
gave a written undertaking that the college would admit 
the students to the MBBS course only after getting 
permission from the authorities concerned. Th

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.