LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

RADHAKISAN RATHI versus ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, DURG AND ORS.

Citation: [1995] 3 S.C.R. 510 · Decided: 19-04-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: P.B. SAWANT · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
RADHAKISAN RATH! 
v. 
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, DURG AND ORS. 
APRIL 19, 1995 
B 
(P.B. SAWANT AND S.B. MAJMUDAR, JJ.J 
Madhya Pradesh Panchayats Act, 1962 : Ss. 103, 104, 130, 157-
Janapada P"1l!chayaf,-/'ower to impose theatre tax-Cinema theatres situated 
within Munidipalities or Municipal Corporations as also within territorial juris-
C diction of Janapada Panchayats-Held, Janapada Panchayats are entitled to 
impose theatre tax on such theatres and there will be no double taxation 
involved in such a case. 
The appellants, owners of cinema theatres, filed writ petitions before 
the High Court challenging the imposition of theatre tax by the concerned 
D Janapada Panchayats on the ground that they were already paying theatre 
tax under the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 or the Madhya 
Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. Their case was that once 
cinema taxes were imposed on cinema theatres by concerned local 
authori.ties, they could not be taxed by Janapada Panchayats by way of 
E theatre tax. The High Court dismissed the writ petition. Aggri.eved, tho 
theatre owners filed the appeals by special leave 
It was contended for the appellants that the Madhya Pradesh 
Panchayats Act, 1962 was concerned with only rural areas and theatres 
situated in urban areas like Municipal Council or the Corporation limits 
F could not be covered by the tax net available under the Panchayats Act 
"-
Dismissing the appeals, this Court 
HELD : 1. A cinema theatre situated within the territorial limits of 
local municipality or a corporation can be taxed by the concerned 
G municipality In exercise of Its powers under the relevant Municipal Act. 
But If the same theatre is also situated within a block duly constituted 
under the Panchayats Act it would fall within the territori.al limits of the 
concerned Janapada Panchayat constituted for that block as laid down by 
Section 103 read with Section 104 or the Madhya Pradesh Panchayats Act 
H 
1962 and the concerned Janapada Panchayat would obviously be entitled 
510 
\ 
• 
RADHAKJSAN RATill v. ADDL. COLLECTOR DURG . 
511 
to invoke Its taxation powers under Section 157 for the area within its A 
jurisdiction and if a theatre is situated within that area then obviously 
Section 157 would get attracted for imposing the twin types of taxes 
mentioned by Section 157 which are permissible to be imposed by the 
Janapada Panchayat. (516-G, H, 517-A, BJ 
There is no express ouster of taxing power of the Janapada B 
Panchayat for any area falling within Its block where any local authority 
is discharging its functions under its own Act. It is well settled that the 
same subject matter can be covered by taxation nets imposed by different 
competent taxing authorities and there will be no double taxation involved 
in such a case. (519-B, 517-8) 
C 
Sri Krishna Das v. Town Area Committee, Chiragaon, (1990) 3 SCC 
645, relied on. 
2.1. Though the preamble of the Panchayats Act refers to rural areas 
for which the Act is enacted, the term 'rural area' is nowhere defined In the D 
Act. It Is not a term of art. It Is for the State Government In exercise of Its 
power under Section 103 of the Actto divide a district into blocks. Once that 
is done as per Section 104(1) there shall be Janapada Pancbayat for every 
block, having jurisdiction over the block. The theatres belonging to all the 
appellants are situated within the blocks falling within the territorialjuris-
E 
diction of the concerned Janapada Pancbayats. It Is precisely for that 
reason that the Janapada Pancbayats have Imposed theatre tax on these 
theatres situated within their jurisdiction as per Section 157 (b) of the Act. 
It is also necessary to keep In view that none of the appellants have chal-
lenged the formation of blocks as made by the State Government by Issuing 
notifications under Section 103 of the Act. (518-E. FJ 
F 
2.2. All the taxes levied by Janapada Pancbayat form part or 
Janapada Panchayat Fund which has to be utilised for discharging the 
statutory functions or Janapada Panchayat as laid down by Section 130 
which shows that Janapada Panchayat can carry out Its socio-economic 
functions In any part of the block within Its jurisdiction and that way even G 
Includes local areas of municipalities falling within the block. A 
municipality can consist .of area which are within the revenue limits of 
district, which In tum mlly get divided Into blocks for the purpose of 
Pancbayats Act by notification Issued by

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.