LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

R. MANJULA versus V. RAJA

Citation: [2009] 1 S.C.R. 421 · Decided: 20-01-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ARIJIT PASAYAT · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2009) 1 S.C.R. 421 
l 
R. MANJULA 
A 
.. 
v. 
V. RAJA 
(Transfer Petition (C) No. 458 of 2007) 
JANUARY 20, 2009 
B 
[DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND ASOK KUMAR 
GANGUL Y, JJ.] 
Matrimonial dispute - Transfer Petition - Wife seeking 
transfer of case from Nasik (Maharashtra) to Vellur c 
(Tamilnadu) - Parties directed to appear before Mediation 
Centre, Vellur - Thereafter filing a joint compromise memo 
that the parties willing to live together along with their children 
at Vellur - Proceedings closed - Transfer Petition disposed 
~ 
of accordingly. 
D 
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Transfer Petition (C) No. 
458 of 2007. 
B. Sridhar, for the Petitioner. 
E 
G. Sivabalamurugan, Y. Arunagiri and L.K. Pandey, for the 
Respondent. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
DR. ARIJIT PASA YAT, J. 1. This transfer petition has been 
F 
filed by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of H.M.P. No.289 
of 2005 titled V. Raja v. R. Manjula pending in the Court of 
learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nasik, Maharashtra. 
Prayer is to transfer the case to Family Court at Vellur District, 
Tamil Nadu. During the pendency of the matter, a Bench of this 
G 
Court directed the parties to appear before the District 
Mediation Centre, Vellore to explore the possibility of setting 
the disputes. By report dated 4.11.2008 the Mediation Centre 
has reported as follows: 
421 
H 
422 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2009) 1 S.C.R. 
A 
"The parties have appeared and advises given. 
Parties given time to think and decide. Parties filed joint 
compromise memo. Joint compromise memo recorded. 
The Mediation Centre has successfully conducted enquiry 
as per the directions of Honourable Supreme court Legal 
B 
Services Committee. Parties are now living together after 
compromise efforts. 
This information submitted to Honourable Supreme 
Court Legal Services Committee." 
C 
2. Learned counsel for the parties has also filed a joint 
D 
E 
compromise memo which reads as follows: 
'We both appeared before Vellore District Mediation 
Centre, Vellore (Tamil Nadu State) for five dates (i.e.) on 
17.10.2008, 31.10.2008, 7.11.2008 14.11.2008 and 
28.11.2008. We both were advised by Honourable 
committee Members. Sufficient time was granted to think 
and decide the issue. After consultation of our elders and 
as per benevolent advice of Mediation Centre we are 
ยท whole heartedly willing to live together along with our 
children at our native village, Arcot, Vellore District in Tamil 
Nadu." 
3. In view of the aforesaid happy situation, nothing needs 
to be done in these proceedings except to direct that further 
ยท F continuance of H.M.P. No.289 of 2005 is not necessary. The 
proceedings stand closed. 
4. The transfer petition is accordingly disposed of. 
G.N. 
Transfer petition disposed of.