LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

R.K. SETHI AND ANOTHER ETC. versus OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION

Citation: [1997] 1 S.C.R. 616 · Decided: 28-01-1997 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.C. AGRAWAL, FAIZAN UDDIN · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
R.K. SETHI AND ANOTHER ETC. 
v. 
OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION 
JANUARY 28, 1997 
B 
[S.C. AGRAWAL AND FAIZAN UDDIN, JJ) 
Se1Vice Law : Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959-Section 
32/0il and Natural Gas Commission (Tem1s and conditions of appointment 
i11 se1vice)Regulation 1975--Clause H(iii), B(iii)b Oil and Natural Gas Com-
C mission Recruitment and Promotion Regulatio11, 1980 a11d Executive Instmc-
tio11s dated Ap1il 25, 198o--Para 5(iii), (viiij-fi'ixation of inter se se11iority 
consequent upon merger of Telex operators with the cadre of Assista11t Grade 
11 (AG 1/)-Telex operators were placed enbloc below AG-IE-But were of 
fered promotio11al benefit under 12 years and 18 years policies, promoting 
D them as AG-I and then as Superintendent-Same benefit offered to AG-I! 
Officers-Held: Not arbitrary-Not unreasonable-In consonance with 'Next 
below mle' of se1Vice jwispmdence-Seniority of the Telex Operators has to 
be detem1i11ed by provisions of Clause H(iii) of 1975 Regulations and not by 
Clause B(iii)(b)-AG-ll officers of westem Region could not be so promoted 
E as the Telex operators in that region did not accept such promotion-171e 
Commission not bound to promote them merely because AG-II employees 
of the other two regions were so promoted-Steps taken by Commission per-
missible in law-High Court's direction to convert A G-1/ from regional to 
central cadre and to prepare a consolidated list of all regions for the purpose 
of promotion-Not justified as the decision of the Commissio.•1 does not suffer 
F from any vice of arbitrariness. 
In the Oil and Natnral Gas Commission, recruitment and promotion 
upto a certain level is on regional basis and thereafter it is centralised. In 
the personal and Administrative Discipline, appointment and promotion 
G to the posts of Assistant Grade-III, Assistant Grade-II and Assistant 
Grade-I are made on regional basis and appointment and promotion to 
the higher posts of Superintendent and above are made on centralised 
basis. 
Telex Operators in the Oil and Natural Gas Commission were 
H merged and redesignated as Assistant Grade-II by executive instructions 
616 
R.K. SETIII v. O.N.G.C. 
617 
... > 
dated 25th April, 1980. As a result of the merger, the Telex Operators were A 
placed enbloc below the Assistant Grade-II employees in each region. But 
they were given promotional benefit under 12 years and 18 years polices. 
On the basis of 12 years policy the Telex Operators in the Central and Head 
Quarter regions were promoted as Assistant Grade-I with effect from May 
17, 1980 and on the basis of 18 years policy they were further promoteci as B 
Superintendent with effect from April 1, 1982. The same benefit was ex-
tended to the regular employees of these two regions and as such they were 
-. 
also promoted by order dated February 2, 1984. The employees of the 
Western Region could not be promoted as the Telex Operators in the region 
did not accept such promotions. The employees of the Western region filed 
, 
a writ petitio~ in the High Court challenging the order of promotion dated c 
February 2, 1984 and asking for retrospective promotion along with the 
promotees of the other two regions. The High Court allowed the petition 
and quashed the promotions of the respondents who were made parties in 
the writ petition and also stayed further promotions till a consolidated list 
of all regions was prepared. Against tlie order of the High Court the present D 
appeals are filed by the affected employees and the Commission. The Writ 
-< 
Petition is filed by two of the affected employees of the Headquarter region 
:::' 
whose promotions were revoked by the Commission pursuant to the order 
of the High Court. 
Allowing the appeals and the Writ Petiton, this Court 
E 
HELD : 1.1. The Telex Operators are rightly placed en bloc below the 
regular employees in Assistant Grade-II cadre at the time of merger of the 
cadre of Telex Operators .in the cadre of Assistant Grade-II by Executive 
Instructions dated April 25, 1980. The earlier service of the Telex 
Operators at a lower pay scale before merger could not be equated with 
F 
the service of the regular Assistant Grade-II employees at a higher pay 
scale. Therefore, they were rightly placed junior to the regular employees 
of Assistant Grade-II cadre on merger. [628-D, BJ 
:.".< 
1.2. The seniority of the Telex Operators in the cadre of Assistant 
Grade-II will be governed by the provisions contained in parag

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.