LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

PUSHPA VANTI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: [2010] 13 S.C.R. 784 · Decided: 15-11-2010 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MARKANDEY KATJU, GYAN SUDHA MISRA · Disposal: Hearing Adjourned

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[201 O] 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 784 
PUSHPA VANTI 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
(Writ Petition (c) No. 291 of 2010) 
NOVEMBER 15,2010 
[MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] 
ARMED FORCES: 
c 
Pension - Claimed by a widow of Army Major - Court 
noticing wide-spread discontent among the serving and former 
members of armed forces and their widows and family 
members regarding their service conditions, pension etc. and 
Jack of proper attention by bureaucrats to their grievances -
0 
Court appointed Armed Forces Grievances Redressal 
Commission - The term of the first Commission fixed for two 
years from the date of its constitution - The subsequent 
Commission shall be appointed by the Central Government 
- Directions about Headquarters and set-up offices of the 
E Commission, sitting of the Commission etc given - It is made 
clear that the Commission swould be different from the Armed 
Forces Tribunal, in as much as the Commission would be a 
recommendatory body and not an adjudicatory body and 
would not be confined to following the relevant rules relating 
to service conditions, pension etc. but can recommend 
F change of the same, if required - Claim of the petitioner shall 
stand referred to the Commission for its consideration 
expeditiously - Commissions and Inquiries - Setting up of 
Armed Forces Grievances Redressal Commission - Service 
Law - Pension. 
G 
H 
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 
291 of 2010. 
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). 
784 
PUSHPA VANTI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
785 
Dr. Ramesh K. Haritash, B.B,. Trikha, Bansuri Swaraj, 
A 
Savita Devi (for Dr. Kailash Chand) for the Pettioner. 
Gopal Subramaniam SG, Anirudh Kumar, Subhash 
Kaushik, Anil Katiyar for the Respondents. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered 
ORDER 
1. In this case we had issued notice to the respondents 
on 17.9.2010 but no counter affidavit has been filed. 
B 
c 
2. The petitioner before us in the present case is a widow 
Pushpa Vanti, whose husband was an army major who had 
fought in three wars (in 1948, 1962 and 1965) and was 
decorated with fourteen medals. However, the petitioner is 
getting only Rs.80/- per month as pension, in these days when 
D 
a kilogram of arhar dal costs that amount. She has prayed for 
fixation of her correct pension and arrears. 
3. The Indian armed forces are bravely defending the 
borders of the country, often standing on guard at a height of 
E 
20,000 feet and in minus 30oC temperature, day and night so 
that the people of India can live, work and sleep in peace. 
F 
4. However, there is widespread discontent among the 
serving and former members of the armed forces (by which we 
mean the Army, Navy and Air Force) and their widows and 
family members regarding their service conditions e.g. pay 
scales, allowances, anomalies regarding pensions, inadequate 
pension (particularly to those disabled while in service), widows 
benefits, promotion matters (including promotion policy and 
process) etc .. They have a feeling that the bureaucrats do not 
G 
care for them and do not properly address their grievances. As 
a result, thousands of ex- armed forces personnel have returned 
their medals, and some have even burnt their artificial limbs. 
5. These grievances include the grievances relating to pay, 
H 
786 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2010) 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 
A allowances, one rank one pension, other pension matters, 
suitable benefits to be granted to war veterans, war widows, 
promotion matters, rehabilitation of soldiers who are discharged 
at a young age, etc. 
B 
6. In a recent panel discussion 'We The People' on NDTV 
channel some of these wievances were highlighted. 
7. Our courts of law are flooded with cases relating to 
members, both serving and retired, of the armed forces e.g. 
cases relating to pension, promotion, etc and the obvious 
C reason is that the armed forces personnel have a feeling that 
their grievances are not being properly addressed. 
D 
8. The great Prime Minister of Magadha, Chanakya, told 
Emperor Chandragupta Maurya : 
"Pataliputra rests each night in peaceful comfort, 0 King, 
secure in the belief that the distant borders of Magadha are 
inviolate and the interiors are safe and secure, thanks only to 
the Mauryan Army standing vigil with naked swords and eyes 
peeled for action, day and night, in weatherfair and foul, all eight 
E praharas (i.e. round the clock), quite unmindful of personal 
discomfort and hardshi

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.