LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE

Citation: [1973] 3 S.C.R. 189 · Decided: 22-12-1972 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: KUTTYIL KURIEN MATHEW · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK 
v. 
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE 
December 22, 1972 
[K. K. MATHEW AND A. K. MUKHERJEA, JJ.J 
189· 
Punjab Municipd Act, 1911-S. 66 and 61-Whether NDMC can 
include a building retrospectively in the assessment list by amendment. 
The appellant is the owner of No. 5 Parlmment Street, New Delhi. 
The 
build~ng was not entered in the assessment list to be operative 
during April 1, 1958 to March 31, 1959, although it was occupied 
after completion on July I, 1968. Under S. 67 of the Punjab Municipal 
Act, 19! 1, the NDMC by a resolution dated November 
2(), 
1959 
amended the assessment list which was operative for the period April 1, 
1959, to March 31, 196() and imposed house tax· on the building for 
the year 1959-6()_ 
Section 67 of the Act provides that the Committee may at 
any 
time amend the list after giving notioe to ainy person affected by the 
amendment and $ub. s. (2) provides that any interested person may 
tender bis objection and he -shall be give.I) an opportunity 
of 
being 
heard etc. 
The only questio,n that arose for decision before this Court 
was 
whether the Respondent was entitled to include the building 
in 
the 
assessment list, which was operative for the period April 1, 1959 to 
March 31, 196()_ 
Dismissing the appeal, 
HELD : (i) The assessment list for the yOl!r 
commencing 
from 
April ), 1959, had to be settled by March 31, 1959, at the latest. This 
list was liable to be amended under S. 67 even after March 31, 1959 
on any of the grounds mentioned in . that Section. 
Sec. 66 does not 
say that the amendment of the assessment list should have been made 
before March 31, 1959. The expression "subject to such amendment 
as may thereafter be duly made" iin Sec. 66 would indicate that the 
amendment of the list could be made even after March 31, 1959 as 
Sec. 67 pro,ides for amendment of the list "at any time." [193BC] 
It is not necessary that the assessment list should have been amend-
ed before March 31, 1959, in order that the Municipal Committee may 
impose house tax on the building for the period from April 1, 1959 
to March 31. 1960. An amendmant of the list under S. 67 wlls per-
missible on any of the grounds mentioned in the Section 
even 
after 
March 31, 1959, as otherwise, the expression "at any time" would have 
no meaning. 
[193EF] 
(ii) Further, the meaning of the expression "at 
any 
time" 
will 
depend upon the context in which the expression occurs. The expres· 
sio.n "at any time" occurrin~ in S. 67 read with the word "thereafter" 
in S. 66 can only lead to the conclu•ion that the amendment of the 
list in question was permissible even after March 31, 1959. [19SA] 
Central Bank of India Ltd. Amritsar v. The Hartford Fire Insurance 
Co. Ltd. A.I.R. 1965 S.C. 1288; Exparte Norris in Re Sahler 17 Q.B.D. 
728 refe{Ted to 
· 
· 
190 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1973] 3 S.C.R. 
ICIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 1315 of 
1972. 
Appeal by certificate from the judgment and order dated 
October 28, 1969 of the Delhi High Court at New Delhi in Letters 
Patent Appeal No. 93 of 1967. 
A 
M. C. Chagla, S. K. Mehta and K. R. Nagaraja, for the appel-
B 
lant. 
D. D. Chawla, H. K. Puri and S. K. Dhingra, for the respon-
dent. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
MATHEW, J. The appellant, Punjab National Bank Limited, 
is the owner of a building bearing municipal No. 5, Parliament 
Street, New Delhi. 
After completion of its construction, it was 
occupied on July 1, 1958. The building was not entered in the 
assessment list which was to be operative during the period from 
April 1, 1958 to March 31, 1959. On September 4, 1959, the 
New Delhi Municipal Committee, the respondent here, purporting 
to act under s. 67 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, hereinafter 
referred to as the Act, issued a notice to the appellant stating : 
"This is to inform you that your building mentioned 
at the back of this letter has been completed and is in 
fact occupied from 1-7-1958 and ought to be assessed to 
House tax by amending the list for 1959-60 under sec-
tion 67 of the Municipal Act, 1911 and this Committee 
has, vide resolution No. 30 dated 10-7-1959 proposed 
to amend the list for the year 1959-60 by inserting the 
said property on an annual value as given at the !1ack 
of this letter. 
"It is further proposed that the tax will take effect 
from 1-4-1959. 
''Notice is hereby given to you under section 67 of 
the P. M. Act that the Co

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.