LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

PROPOSED VAIBHAV COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Citation: [2024] 12 S.C.R. 732 · Decided: 12-12-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: SUDHANSHU DHULIA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 732 : 2024 INSC 971
Proposed Vaibhav Cooperative Housing Society Limited
v.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
(Civil Appeal No. 5193 of 2024)
12 December 2024
[Sudhanshu Dhulia* and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the allotment of the plot in favour of Medinova Regal 
Co-operative Housing Society (MRHS) was proper or violative of 
the procedure as well as eligibility criteria.
Headnotes†
Allotment of land – Co-operative Housing Society – The 
Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the appellant’s 
writ petition and declined to interfere in the allotment of land 
by the Respondent-State to MRHS:
Held: The entire history of how the plot came to be allotted to 
MRCHS shows nepotism and favouritism for a society which was 
not even eligible in the first place for this allotment – A perusal 
of the records shows that not a single member of the society, is 
a doctor at Tata Memorial Hospital – Leave aside a doctor, not 
one member is an employee of Tata Memorial Hospital which 
was the projection earlier and for which the plot was sought 
to be allotted – The composition of this society has also now 
completely changed from its original composition – If land is 
allotted under the discretionary powers of the government, then 
it is necessary to give reasons in writing as to why such allotment 
is made in favour of a particular society – Since there has to be 
transparency in matters of allotment of land by the government, 
adherence to the rules and regulations becomes important in 
the cases of allotment, but unfortunately, all this is completely 
missing in the present case where allotment was made in favour 
of MRCHS in total violation of the prescribed procedure – Also, 
MRCHS had applied for a different plot than what they were 
ultimately allotted – Nothing has been brought to notice of this 
* Author
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 
733
Proposed Vaibhav Cooperative Housing Society Limited v.  
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Court which would even remotely indicate that the plot actually 
allotted to MRCHS was ever sought by them – This by itself 
vitiates the entire allotment – Similarly, a perusal of the Letter of 
Intent as well as the Letter of Allotment does not disclose any 
reasons why MRCHS was allotted land under the discretionary 
quota – Non-disclosure of reasons shows that such an allotment 
is arbitrary – Thus, the allotment of the plot in favour of MRCHS is 
not proper, as it is violative of the procedure as well as eligibility 
criteria. [Paras 6, 7, 8, 12]
Case Law Cited
Angarki Coop. Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra 
(1997) 9 SCC 713; S.V. Asgaonkar v. MMRDA [2018] 3 SCR 410 : 
(2018) 17 SCC 467 – referred to.
List of Acts
Land Revenue (Disposal of Government Land) Rules, Maharashtra, 
1971 read with Government Regulations dated 09.07.1999.
List of Keywords
Allotment of land; Co-operative Housing Society; Violation of 
procedure; Change of composition; Discretionary powers of 
Government.
Case Arising From
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 5193 of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 24.02.2012 of the High Court 
of Bombay in WP No. 928 of 2010
Appearances for Parties
Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv., Prashant Shrikant Kenjale, Harish 
Nirbhavane, Advs. for the Appellant.
Sanjay Kharde, Shyam Divan, Sr. Advs., Siddharth Dharmadhikari, 
Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, Bharat Bagla, Sourav Singh, Aditya 
Krishna, Ms. Preet S. Phanse, Adarsh Dubey, Sandeep Sudhakar 
Deshmukh, Nishant Sharma, Patil Avi Vilas, Advs. for the 
Respondents.
734
[2024] 12 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Judgment
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
1.	
The appellant has filed this appeal challenging judgement dated 
24.02.2012, whereby a Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay 
has dismissed the appellant’s writ petition and declined to interfere 
in the allotment of land by the Respondent-State to Medinova Regal 
Co-operative Housing Society (hereinafter for brevity “MRCHS” or 
“Respondent No. 5”)
2.	
MRCHS is a proposed housing society and had applied, through 
its Chief Promoter Dr. C.N. Shenoy, to the Chief Minister of the 
State of Maharashtra for allotment of a plot bearing CTS No.629 
Part D, E, F at Bandra on 11.10.2000. It was mentioned in their 
application that the members of applicant society work in Tata 
Memorial Centre, a leading hospital and research institute for 
cancer, and these members do not own any house, despite living in 
Maharashtra for th

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.