LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

PRAKASH BHALOTIA (D) THR HIS LRS versus INDRA CHANDRA GOYAL (D) THRU. LRS

Citation: [2024] 9 S.C.R. 988 · Decided: 25-09-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.K. MAHESHWARI, RAJESH BINDAL · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 9 S.C.R. 988 : 2024 INSC 941
Prakash Bhalotia (D) Thr His LRs 
v. 
Indra Chandra Goyal (D) Thru. LRs
(Civil Appeal No. 10855 of 2024)
25 September 2024
[J.K. Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the courts below were justified in dismissing the eviction suit 
filed by the appellant-landlord and holding that the respondent-tenant 
was entitled to protection under Section 20(4) of the Uttar Pradesh 
Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.
Headnotes†
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent 
and Eviction) Act, 1972 – ss.20(2)(a), 20(4), 30 – Protection 
u/s.20, when not available – Suit filed by the landlord if, to 
be decreed on the ground of non-payment of arrears of rent 
and tenant be evicted:
Held: Yes – Under s.20(2)(a), in case the tenant is in arrears of 
rent of four months, the suit for eviction after determination of his 
tenancy may lie, but such rent may be deposited within one month 
from the date of service of notice of default upon him – In case, 
the due rent along with damages and occupation charges is not 
paid as required u/s.20(2)(a) r/w ss.20(4) and 30, no protection 
would be available as stipulated u/s.20 – Tenancy was for a period 
of five years whereafter, it was extendable by consent of landlord 
with rent enhancement – No agreed lease agreement was entered 
after 30.06.1990, but as per the UP Rent Act, the tenancy would 
become statutory and subject to payment of the enhanced rent, 
the suit can be maintained – But, in case of consecutive default of 
monthly payment of rent and continuous non-payment as specified 
under the UP Rent Act, it may be a ground to grant decree of 
eviction – Tenant was in default in regular payment of monthly rent, 
tax and interest due during pendency of the suit, revision before 
the High Court and also in appeal before this Court – On facts, 
the burden of payment or deposit of rent by tenant not discharged 
to shift onus on landlord – Deposit in one-go after the order of 
this Court would not absolve the tenant from consequence of 
non-payment or delayed payment of rent – Findings recorded by 
[2024] 9 S.C.R. 
989
Prakash Bhalotia (D) Thr His LRs v. Indra Chandra Goyal (D) Thru. LRs
Trial Court and confirmed by the High Court are perverse – Orders 
passed by Trial Court and the High Court set aside – Suit filed by 
the landlord decreed on the ground of non-payment of arrears of 
rent, tenant to be evicted from the suit subject property. [Paras 
13, 15, 22, 25-27]
Rent eviction matters – Revisional jurisdiction of High 
Court – Trial Court dismissed the eviction suit filed by the 
landlord – Revision thereagainst, dismissed by High Court 
holding that re-appraisal of evidence is not permissible in 
revisional jurisdiction:
Held: Once a revision petition is entertained by the High Court, it 
acquires the jurisdiction to call for and examine the records of the 
authority subordinate to it – Any illegality, irregularity or impropriety 
coming to its notice is capable of being corrected by it by passing 
such appropriate order or direction as the law requires and justice 
demands – Therefore, the High Court was required to look into 
the material placed and justifiability of the findings relying those 
documents – In absence of its satisfaction, the High Court ought 
to have interfered and such revision cannot be thrown out on the 
ground of limited scope of jurisdiction. [Para 24]
Case Law Cited
Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar v. Krishnaji Dattatreya Bapat 
[1970] 1 SCR 322 : (1969) 2 SCC 74; Babulal Nagar and Others 
v. Shree Synthetics Ltd. and Others [1984] 3 SCR 772 : (1984) 
Supp SCC 128; Nalakanth Sainuddin v. Koorkikadan Sulaiman 
[2002] Supp. 1 SCR 1 : (2002) 6 SCC 1 – relied on.
Gian Devi Anand v. Jeevan Kumar and Ors. [1985] Supp. 1 SCR 1 : 
(1985) 2 SCC 683 – referred to.
List of Acts
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and 
Eviction) Act, 1972.
List of Keywords
Eviction suit; Non-payment of arrears of rent; Delayed payment of 
rent; Decree of eviction; Determination of tenancy; Date of service of 
notice of default; Due rent; Damages, Occupation charges; Tenancy 
for five years extendable by consent of landlord; Lease agreement; 
Enhanced rent; Consecutive default of monthly payment of rent; 
990
[2024] 9 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
Burden of payment/deposit of rentnot discharged; Continuous 
non-payment; Statutory tenancy; Default in regu

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.