LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

PEOPLES RIGHTS AND SOCIAL RESEARCH CENTRE (PRASAR) & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: [2024] 8 S.C.R. 99 · Decided: 06-08-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: VIKRAM NATH

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 8 S.C.R. 99 : 2024 INSC 582
Peoples Rights and Social Research Centre 
(Prasar) & Ors.  
v. 
Union of India & Ors. 
(Writ Petition (Civil) No. 110 of 2006)
06 August 2024
[Vikram Nath* and Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Matter pertains to the issue of Silicosis among workers in various 
industries across the country.
Headnotes†
Constitution of India – Art. 32, 21, 39(e), 42, 48A and 43 – 
“Silicosis” among workers – Need for systemic reforms – Writ 
petition u/Art. 32 seeking intervention to address the issue 
of “Silicosis” among workers in various industries such 
as mining, construction, stone cutting, and sandblasting, 
where workers exposed to high levels of silica dust causing 
incurable occupational lung disease – Petitioner’s case 
that ‘Silicosis’ rampant throughout India due to inadequate 
detection, monitoring, and remedial measures, thus,urgent 
need for systemic reforms to protect the health and rights 
of workers across the country; and that the State’s failure 
to protect workers from hazardous conditions and provide 
adequate medical care, compensation, and rehabilitation, a 
direct infringement of the constitutional mandates:
Held: As regards the environmental aspect, to ensure that the 
industries abide by certain minimal standards to prevent silicosis 
among their workers, and in the event of non-compliance, these 
industries to face closure – NGT directed to oversee the impact 
of silicosis-prone industries and factories across India and ensure 
that the Central Pollution Control Board and the respective State 
Pollution Control Board comply with the earlier directions of this 
Court – NGT to undertake any additional necessary steps to 
prevent the spread of silicosis by such industries and factories – 
As regards, the adequate compensation to be received by the 
* Author
100
[2024] 8 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
affected workers or their next of kins as swiftly as possible, the 
NHRC directed to oversee the compensation process across 
the respective states – ESIC and the Chief Secretaries of the 
respective states to adhere to the directions of the NHRC and 
collaborate with them to ensure that the compensation distribution 
process is carried out efficiently and without delay – Furthermore, 
the Registry of this Court to ensure that all the relevant reports 
and affidavits submitted by the respective State Committees, the 
CPCB, the NHRC, and the DGMS, are forwarded to the NGT 
and the NHRC to facilitate the execution of their responsibilities 
effectively and swiftly. [Paras 7-9]
Case Law Cited
Occupational Health & Safety Association Versus Union of India 
& Ors. [W.P.(C) No. 79 of 2005] Order dated 30.01.2008 – 
referred to.
List of Acts
Constitution of India; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Protection 
of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006; Factories Act, 1948; 
Mines Act, 1952; National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
List of Keywords
Issue of “Silicosis”; Industries such as mining, construction, stone 
cutting, and sandblasting; High levels of silica dust; Incurable 
occupational lung disease; Inadequate detection, monitoring, 
and remedial measures; Systemic reforms; State’s failure to 
protect workers from hazardous conditions and provide adequate 
medical care; Compensation; Rehabilitation; Environmental 
aspect; Compensation distribution process; National Green 
Tribunal; Central Pollution Control Board; State Pollution Control 
Board.
Case Arising From
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No.110 of 2006
(Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India)
With
Transferred Case (C) No.8 of 2017
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 
101
Peoples Rights and Social Research Centre (Prasar) & Ors. v. 
Union of India & Ors.
Appearances for Parties
Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG, Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G., Shiv Mangal 
Sharma, Tapesh Kumar Singh, A.A.Gs., Colin Gonsalves, Uday Gupta, 
Arijit Prasad, Sr. Advs., Ms. Mugdha, Kamran Khwaja, Satya Mitra, 
Prashant Bhushan, Ms. Shivani Lal, Gaurav Dave, Ms. Sanam Singh, 
Harish Dasan, Rajiv Ranjan, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Ms. Yogamaya 
M.G., Hiren Dasan, Digvijay Dam, Abhishek Kumar, Navanjay 
Mahapatra, Pranay Ranjan, Siddharath Sinha, Amrish Kumar, Debojit 
Borkakati, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, 
Samir Ali Khan, Pranjal Sharma, Kashif Irshad Khan, Milind Kumar, 
Jasmeet Singh, P. V. Yogeswaran, Ms. Neha Rathi, Kamal Kishore, 
Ms. Kajal Giri, B. Balaji, Ms. Mukti Chaudhry, Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, 
Chanchal

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.