LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. versus KHAGESWAR SUNDARAY AND ORS.

Citation: [2011] 10 S.C.R. 196 · Decided: 11-08-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: R.V. RAVEENDRAN · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[2011] 10 S.C.R. 196 
ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. 
v. 
KHAGESWAR SUNDARAY AND ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 6904 of 2011) 
AUGUST 11, 2011 
[R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND A.K. PATNAIK, JJ.) 
Service Law - Advance increments - Entitlement to -
Cut-off date - Office order passed by the Orissa State 
C Electricity Board (OSEB) that Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) 
in OSEB shall be granted two advance increments in the time-
scale of pay on their becoming graduates while in service -
Wages of OSEB employees revised - OSEB constituted an 
Anomaly Committee to examine the issue with regard to 
D advance increments in the revised scales of pay - Anomaly 
Committee made recommendation that the benefit of 
advance increments in the revised scales of pay be confined 
tO employees who graduated or had passed the Accounts 
Examinations on or before 30.06.1971 - Recommendations 
E of the Anomaly Committee accepted by the OSEB -
Respondent Nos. 1 to 5, who were working as LDCs under the 
OSEB, and had passed graduate examinations in the years 
1974 - 1976, were not granted advance increments by the 
OSEB - They filed writ petition - High Court allowed the writ 
F petition holding that the decision of the OSEB did not disclose 
any reason, far Jess any justifiable reason, to confine the 
benefit of the two advance increments only to the employees 
fulfilling the criteria by a cut-off date i.e. 30.06.1971 and hence 
the decision was arbitrary - High Court accordingly quashed 
the decision of the OSEB so far as respondent Nos. 1 to 5 
G were concerned and directed that two advance increments be 
notionally given to them in their pre-revised scale of pay with 
effect from the respective dates they acquired the degree 
qualifications in the year 1974-1976 and on that basis fix their 
H 
196 
ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION 
197 
LTD. v. KHAGESWAR SUNDARAY 
current pay and pay their current salary accordingly - On 
A 
appeal, held: The view taken by the High Court that the 
decision of OSEB was arbitrary and discriminatory is not 
sustainable in law - The OSEB as the employer was fully with 
its powers to decide the cut-off date for the employees to 
become a graduate or passing the Accounts Examinations 
B 
to be eligible to the two advance increments in the revised 
scales of pay and the decision of the OSEB could not be held 
to be arbitrary only because the reason for decision was not 
stated in the proceedings of the meeting of the OSEB in which 
the decision was taken - Order of the High Court set aside c 
and the writ petition of respondent Nos. 1 to 5 dismissed -
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14. 
State of Bihar and Ors. v. Ramjee Prasad and Ors. (1999) 
3 SCC 368: 1990 (2) SCR 468 and National Council 
Education and Ors. v. Shri Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan 
D 
Sansthan and Ors. (2011) 3 SCC 238: 2011 (2) SCR 291 -
relied on. 
Sushma Sharma (Dr.) v. State of Rajasthan 1985 supp. 
SCC 45; UGC vs. Sadhana Chaudhary (1996) 10 SCC 536: 
E 
1996 (6) Suppl. SCR 392; Ramrao vs. All lndiaBackward 
Class Bank Employees Welfare Association (2004) 2 SCC 
76: 2004 (1) SCR 19 and State of Punjab vs. Amar Nath 
Goyal (2005) 6 SCC 754: 2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 549 -
referred to. 
F 
Case Law Reference: 
1990 (2) SCR 468 
relied on 
Para 7 
2011 (2) SCR 291 
relied on 
Para 8 
G 
1985 Supp. sec 45 
referred to 
Para 8 
1996 (6) Suppl. SCR 392 
referred to 
Para 8 
2004 (1) SCR 19 
referred to 
Para 8 
2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 549 
referred to 
Para 8 
H 
198 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2011] 10 S.C.R. 
A 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 
B 
c 
6904 of 2011. 
From the Judgment & Order dated 18.12.2007 of the High 
Court of Orissa at Cuttac in O.J.C. No. 5768 of 1994. 
Raj Kumar Mehta . Antrryami, Upadhyay for the Appellant. 
Shibashish Mishra, Umang Shankar, Ugra Shankar Prasad 
for the Respondents. 
The order of the Court was delivered by 
ORDER 
A. K. PATNAIK, J. 1. Leave granted. 
D 
ยท 2. This is an appeal against the order dated 18.12.2007 
of the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court in OJC No.5768 
of 1994. 
3. The facts very briefly are that the Orissa State Electricity 
Board (for short 'the OSEB') decided in its meeting held on 
E 02.05.1970 that Lower Division Clerks (for short 'the LDCs') 
in the Circles, Divisions and Sub-Divisions of the OSEB shall 
be granted two advance increments in the time-scale of pay 
attached to the post on their becoming graduates while in 
service. Accordingly, an office order was passed

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.