ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD. versus RABI SANKAR PATRO & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2017] 13 S.C.R.921 ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD. v. RABI SANKAR PATRO & ORS. (Civil Appeal Nos. 17869-17870of2017) NOVEMBER 3, 2017 [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND UDAY UMESH LAUT, JJ.] Education/Educational Institutions: Technical education - Through distant education mode - Imparted A B by Deemed to be University - Respondent-employees acquired C Engineering degree through distance education mode, from Deemed to be Universities - Thereafter, filed Writ Petition seeking promotion on the basis of engineering degree - Plea of appellant-employer that the employees were not qualified for promotion as degrees acquired by them was from such institutions which were not approved D by AICTE and hence not recognized - High Court allowed the case of employees holding that service rules did not specify that qualifications obtained through distance education was not permissible and that the degree was required to be obtained fi'om the approved Universities of AICTE - On appeal, held: Decision as to whether subjects leading to degrees in engineering, could be taught in distance education mode or not is within the exclusive domain of AICTE - The Deemed to be universities in question had started the courses in Engineering through distance education mode without the approval of AICTE - IGNOU Act nowhere entitles IGNOU to be the Controlling Authority of the entire field of distance education of learning across the country and in relation to programmes of other Universities or institutions - Therefore, Distance Education Council (DEC) created u/s. 28 of IGNOU Act cannot act as a regulator for other Universities - Despite several policy guidelines that DEC alone was not entitled to grant permission for open distance learning, DEC went on granting G permission without consulting AICTE - Such exercise on part of DEC was without jurisdiction - Therefore, the permission granted E F by DEC in the first instance allowing the Deemed to be Universities in question to introduce courses leading to award of degrees in engineering were illegal and opposed to law - Such illegality could H 921 922 A B c D E F G H SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 13 S.C.R. not be cured by ex post facto approvals granted later - The grant of ex post facto approval were also superficial and perfimctory - However, since 2004 UGC Guidelines themselves had given liberty to the concerned Deemed to be Universities to apply for ex-post facto approval, the matter is considered with sympathy in the interest of students who were enrolled during the academic session 2001- 2005 - it would be appropriate to grant some chance to the concerned students to have their ability tested by authorities competent in thrit behalf' - Therefore, the degrees qf' such students shall stand suspended till they pass such examination under the joint supervision of AJCTE-UGC - Degrees of students who were admitted after ex-post facto approval, shall stand recalled and be treated as cancelled - Direction to CBJ to carry out investigation as regards the conduct of the concerned officials who granted permission - UGC is directed to consider withdrawal of Deemed to be University status to the concerned institutions - UGC is also directed to stop the practice of using the word "University "by the Deemed to be Universities as this is opposed to the spirit of' s. 23 of UGC Act -- All lndia Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - s. 23 - lndira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985 - s. 28 - All lndia Council for Technical Education (Grant of Approval for Starting New Technical Institutions, Introduction of Courses or Programmes and Approval of Intake Capacity of Seats for Courses or Programmes) Regulations, 1994 - National Policy on Education. 1986 - Guidelines for establishing new departments within the campus, setting up of off-campus centre(s)linstitutions(s)lqff-shore campus and starting distance education programmes by the Deemed to be universities, 2004 - Orissa Service Engineering Rules, 1941. 'University' and Deemed to be University' - Distinction between - Discussed. Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The definition of"Technical Education" in Section 2(g) of All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 (AICTE Act) shows that the emphasis is on the programmes of education, research and training in Engineering Technology in general and the idea is not limited
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex