ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus ANGAD KOL AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2009) 2 S.C.R. 695 -.·-t ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. A v. ANGAD KOL AND ORS. Criminal Appeal No. 1102 of 2009 FEBRUARY 18, 2009 B [S.8. SINHA AND V.S. SIRPURKAR, JJ.] t Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -Fatal accident- By goods carriage vehicle- Compensation. claim-Insurance Company denying its liability contending that the driver of the vehicle c was not holding valid licence-Held: Insurance company not liable to pay the compensation- It is proved that the offending vehicle was goods carriage vehicle and the driver did not possess valid licence for the same- Direction to insurance company to pay the claim amount, with liberty to recover the same from owner and driver of offending vehicle- Constitution D •· of India, 1950- Article 142. In a claim seeking compensation for death caused by a motor accident, the plea of the appellant-insurance company was that, it was not liable to pay the E compensation as the driver of the offending vehicle was not holding a valid driving licence, as the offending vehicle ;. was a goods carriage vehicle. y Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD : 1.1 It is proved that the driver of the offending F vehicle did not hold a valid and effective driving licence for driving a goods vehicle. Breach of conditions of the insurance is, therefore, apparent on the face of the records. It has been proved that the offending vehicle was ~ a goods vehicle. The Regional Transport Officer, in his G deposition, stated so. [Paras -17 and 18] [ 704-C-D] National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Annappa lrappa Nesaria, (2008) 3 SCC 464; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Prabhu 695 H 696 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2009] 2 S.C.R. A Lal, (2008) 1 SCC 696; Ashok Gangadha_r Maratha v. Oriental Insurance, 1999 (6) SCC 620 -referred to 1.2 'Interest of justice would be subserved if, in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Cons.titution, the insurance company is directed to B deposit the balance amount before the Tribunal with liberty to the claimants to withdraw the same. Appellant is ... ., given righf to recover the said amount from the owner . ~- and the drivef. of the vehicle. [Para 19] [604-F] "· C CASE LAW REFERENCE D (2008) 3 SCC 464 Referred to Para 16 (2008) 1 SCC 696 ' Referred to. Para 17 I (1999) 6 SCC 620 Referred to Para 17 I , ' I f. CIVIL: APPEALLAE JURISQ.ICTION : Civil Appeal No. 1102 pt 2009 From the Judgement and Order dated 21.09.2007 of the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur in Misc. Appeal No. 1593 ,~- E of 2007. '. ;' Santosh Paul,' K.K. Bhatt, Arvind Gupla, Sriharash N. Bundela, M.J. Paul for the Petitioner. \ · " Raj .Kumar Gupta, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Dhar?m Bir Raj F Vuhra for the Respondent. , The Judgem~nt of the Court Was deli~erJd by S.B. SINHA, J. G 1. Leave .. granted. .~ . .. • ,l_ • '.:• ' ;i ....... ,,,,,,.r-(.> 2. This appeal is directed against}~:·Tudgment and order dated 21.9.2007 passed by a Division ·Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Misc. Application No':21/09/ · 2007 whereby and whereunder the pppeal~· preferred by the H claima?ts/respondents from an ·award dated 29.1.~607 passed I 1'. I ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. V. 697 ANGAD KOL AND ORS. [S.S. SINHA, J.] by the llnd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Fast Track A .... --t Court), Kanti (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in M.V.C. No.350 of 2004, was allowed. A cross objection filed by the· appellant herein has also been dismissed by the said judgment. 3. Heirs and legal representatives of Genda Bai, who died B in an accident which took place on 31.10.2004, filed a claim application before the Tribunal, contending in that on the fateful day, when she had been standing near a turning known as 'Hardi turning', a mini door Auto bearing registration No. MP-20G-9937 dashed against her as a result whereof she suffered injuries. She was taken to the District Hospital where she succumbed c thereto on the next day. The deceased was aged about 45 years at the time of her death. She allegedly used to earn about Rs.5,000/- per month by preparing 'Donnapattals'. D .. ~ 4. Indisputably, the vehicle was a goods carriage vehicle which was owned by Respondent No. 7, Narendra, and was being driven by Respondent No.6, Umesh. Before the Tribunal, a contention was raised that the driver of the vehicle did not possess a valid and effective driving licence. Overruling the said
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex