LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

OMBIR SINGH AND OTHERS ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC.

Citation: [1992] 3 S.C.R. 697 · Decided: 30-07-1992 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: L.M. SHARMA · Disposal: Dismissed

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

OMBIR SINGH AND OTHERS ETC. ETC. 
A 
~ 
v. 
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC. 
JULY 30, 1992 
[LALIT MOHAN SHARMA AND N.M.KASLIWAL, JJ.) 
B 
" 
Education-Post-Graduate Medical Entrance Examination-Percent-
' 
age of marks prescribed for admission-Legality of-Recommendation to 
..... 
' -J 
Government to relax to fill up the vacancies. 
c 
Constitution of India, 1950-Article 14-Post-Graduate Medical 
-
Entrance Examination-Different percentage of marks prescribed for students 
of general and SC/ST categories-Legality of-Recommendation to Govern-
ment to relax to fill up the vacancies. 
~. 
The writ-petitioners-doctors, after passing the M.B.B.S. examina- D 
tion, appeared for the Post-Graduate Medical Entrace Examination in the 
year 1992. They were unsuccessful, as they secured less than 50% marks, 
which were necessary for the students of general category and 40% marks 
for SC/ST according to the rules for admission applicable for Post-
Graduate course. 
E 
-
-, 
The present writ petitions were filed challenging the rules for admis-
sion. 
-:-
The petitioners contended t.hat as a result of the application of the 
admission rule a large number of seats remained vacant and in view of the F 
observations made in Dr. Ambesh Kumar etc. etc. v. Principal, LLRM 
-I_ 
~ 
Medical College Meerut and Ors. etc. etc., (1984] 1 SCR 661 such a situation 
must be avoided and the remaining seats should be filled up by applying 
different criteria; that there were 439 seats available in the General 
category, out of which only 300 candidates secured minimum qualifying G 
marks, i.e. 50% marks and 139 seats were lying vacant; that in case of 
reserved category for SC/ST there were 96 seats out of which only 18 
candidates secured 40% minimum qualifying marks and as such 78 seats 
.... --< ''\ 
were lying vacant; that in all 217 seats were lyi~g vacant; that there was a 
great dearth of Post-Graduate doctors in the country and.it would not only 
be a sheer wastage of money in paying salaries ind other emoluments to H 
697 
698 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(1992] 3 S.C.R. 
A the teachers but also in the maintenance and upkeep of infra-structure 
available for teaching in the various disciplines of Post-Graduate Courses; 
and that it would not only be in the interest of the petitioners but also in 
the national interest, if the vacant seats were filled by lowering the mini- ยท 
mum percentage of qualifying marks in the entrance examination; 
B 
Dismissing the writ petitions, this Court, 
HELD: 1.01. So for as the validity of the admission rules fixing 50% 
for the general category candidates and 40% marks for the SC/ST category 
candidates to be obtained at the entrance examination as minimum 
C qualifying marks for being eligible for admission to the Post-Graduate 
medical courses, the same are not subject to any challenge. [700CJ 
D 
1.02. The rule laying down minimum qualifying marks for admission 
to post-Graduate medical courses is legal and no exception can be taken 
to the same. [7018) 
1.03. Once having held that the rule prescribed by the State Govern-
ment laying down minimum qualifying marks in the entrance examinatidn 
is valid and the State Government having followed the rule in granting 
admission in Post-Graduate courses, it cannot be held that such action is 
illegal. There is no infringement of any legal right much less of any 
E 
fundamental right or the petitioners. (70381 
F 
Dr. Ambesh Kumar. etc. etc. v. Principal, LLRM Medical College, 
Meerut and Ors. etc. etc., (1987) 1 S.C.R. 661, explained. 
Ajay Kumar Agrawal and Others v;State of U.P. and others, (1991) 1 
S.C.C. 636 and State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Dr. Anupam Gupta etc., 
A.l.R. 1992 S.C.,932, referred to. 
1.00:. The rule of minimum qualifying marks for admission to Post-
Graduate courses was in vogue for the last many years and large number 
1 
G of seats remained vacant in earlier years also. (702 CJ 
H 
1.05. It was for the State Government to have taken note of such 
situation and to have amended the rules for admission so as to fill all the 
seats available for Post-Gradu.ate courses. (702 DJ 
1.06. The State Government is recommended to take suitable steps 
,. 
-
-
-
OMBIR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. [KASLIWAL, J.) 
699 
for redressing the long felt grievance of the doctors to fill up all the vacant A 
seats for Post-Graduate courses and which would be a step in the larger 
public interest also. The State Government may do so for admission to 
Post-Gra

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.