OMBALIKA DAS AND ANR. versus HULISA SHAW
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A OMBALIKA DAS AND ANR. v. HULISA SHAW APRIL 3, 2002 B [R.C. LAHOTI AND P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, JJ.] Rent and Eviction : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 as amended by amending Act, C 1979 : Sections 13(1) (ff) and 29 B. D Eviction-Recourse to Special Procedure (Summary-Procedure)- Eligibility for-Held, Cannot be taken advantage, by the landlord on the ground of relationship with a member of military, naval or air-force after his retirement. Interpretation of Statutes : Summary provisions-Interpretation of-When the languag~ of a statute is plain and explicit, then the expression employed by the Legislature cannot E be expanded. Words and Phrases: 'Such Member' in the context of Section 29(B) of the West Bengal Pemises Tenancy Act, 1956. F Two major daughters of a retired engineer in the General Reserve Engineering Force, initiated eviction proceeding under Section 13(l)(fl) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act against their tenants claiming themselves to be residing with their father and dependent on him and, therefore, seeking benefit under Section 29(B) by having recourse to summary procedure. Leave to defend petition of the tenant was denied as filed beyond the prescribed time G limit. Aggrieved, tenant preferred a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution which was dismissed by the High Court. In the meanwhile Rent Controller passed eviction order against the tenant. Tenant preferred Revision petition which was allowed by the High Court and in supersession of the order of the Rent Controller eviction petitions were dismissed. Hence this appeal. H 902 - -- OMBALIKA DAS v. HUL!SA SHAW 903 The main issue arising for decision before this Court is whether major A relations of the retired military personnel are entitled to claim benefit of Special procedure as prescribed under Section 29(B) for recovery of possession - under the Act. Dismissing the appeal, the Court B HELD: 1.1. The special procedure of Section 29 B of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act cannot be taken advantage of by a landlord who is a relation of a member of such service, after his retirement because the words "while in service or within five years of retirement" qualify the preceding words "of such member who dies", and are, therefore, referable to the event C of death of such member. If only the Legislature would have intended that the benefit of Section 29 B should be available to a lanc:Iord who is a relation of a member of such senrice even after his retirement and living, in that case, in the part of the provision which is under consideration the Legislature would have used some such words as "a member or retired member" or simply "such member" instead of '~a member", but the Legislature has not chosen to do D so. [911-G, H; 912-A, BJ 1.2. Sub-section (1) of Section 29 B of the amended Act contemplates four categories of landlords, the fourth one again sub-divided into two sub- categories, who can take advantage of the special procedure for disposal of application for eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement. The E Legislature prefixes adjective 'such' to noun 'member'; in Section 29 B (1) of the amended Act; to indicate/specify that 'member' has to be read in the same sense as is attributable to it in the preceding part of the sentence dealing with the relation of landlord with the member of the naval, military or air-force. However, while dealing with other categories of landlords as defined under F this Section the Legislature has consciously not used the words "such members" in the context of relation. [908-D, E; 910-B. 909-GJ Central Bank of India v. Ravindra and Ors., [2002) 1SCC367, relied on. New Webster's Dictionary and Thesaurus, referred to. 1.3. A relation, who is a dependent and also jointly residing with member of naval, military or air-force of the Union of India would hardly have an occasion or need to initiate proceedings for eviction so long as such member G is alive and in service. A relation (dependent and jointly residing), a minor child and the widow - are such three classes as the Legislature intended to H 904 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2002] 2 S.C.R. A treat at par. This inference and such classification into the several categories, finds support from provisos (a), (b) and (c) of Section 29 B. According to ~ proviso (c), the certificate by the Area or Sub-Area Commander of the ~ jurisdiction is to be issued by reference to
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex