LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

NISHANT PURI versus STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.

Citation: [1998] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 271 · Decided: 02-12-1998 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. VENKATASWAMI, M. JAGANNADHA RAO · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

NISHANT PURI 
A 
v. 
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. 
DECEMBER 2, 1998 
[K. VENKATASWAMI AND M. JAGANNADHA RAO, JJ.] 
B 
Medical admission-Himachal Pradesh University-prospectus-Clause 
Ill-Eligibility of admission-Bona fide residents of Himachal Pradesfr-
Rt!quirement of passing two examinations from schools situated in Himachal 
Pradeslr-Exemption to wards of serving Central Government Employees- C 
Appellant's mother a Himachal Pardesh State Government employee-At her 
own request sent on deputation to work with Chandigarh Education 
Department-Appel/ant's application for combined entrance test for MB.B.S. 
admission-Rejection of-Writ-High Court held exemption under clause III 
~ 
was not available to appellant because his mother was only a State D 
Government employee working on deputation with the Central Government 
and she cannot be considered to be a Central Government emp/oyee-
Appeal preferred before Supreme Court-Held, purpose behind clause (iii) 
is that bona fide Himachali Students should be given preference over others-
Object is to protect those students whose parents were obliged to move out 
of Himachal State on account of exigencies of service, by reason of which the E 
children also moved out of State-Mother of the Appellant went on deputation 
of her own volition and not out of compulsion or exigencies of service-It 
cannot be said that she is a Central Government employee as contemplated 
in Clause (iii) of the eligibility clause-High Court was right in dismissing 
the writ petition of the appellant. 
F 
Meenakshi Malik v. University of Delhi and Ors., [1989) 3 SCC 112, 
distinguished. 
Anand Madaan v. State of Haryana and Ors., 11995) 2 SCC 135, relied 
OIL 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ; Civil Appeal No. 6037 of 
1998. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 4.9.97 of the Himachal Pradesh 
G 
High Court in C.W.P.No. 305of1997. 
H 
271 
272 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1998] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 
A 
J.D. Jain, M.R. Vig and Balbir Singh Gupta for the Appellant. 
B 
c 
A.V. Palli, Atul Sharma and Ms. Rekha Palli for the Respondent in 
No.3. 
Himinder Lal for the Respondent in No. 4. 
Naresh K. Sharma for the Respondent No. I. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
Special leave granted 
Heard counsel for the parties. 
The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether 
a State Government employee lent on deputation (at the request of the State 
Government employee on health ground) to a department of the Central 
D Government can be C!Jnsidered as a 'serving Central Government employee" 
within the meaning of the eligibility .clause as provided by Himachal Pradesh 
University in a combined prospectus for admission for M.B.B.S./B.D.S/B.A.M.S 
courses. 
E 
The relevant clauses in the Prospectus read as follows :-
"Definition of bona fide residents of Himachal Pradesh" 
A bona fide Himachali is a person who has permanent home in 
Himachal Pradesh and includes a person who has been residing in 
Himachal Pradesh for a period not less than 15 years or a person who 
p 
has permanent home in Himachal Pradesh but on account of his 
occupation he is living outside Himachal Pradesh." 
G 
H 
Eligibility -" 
(i) Candidates who have to compete for admission to Indira Gandhi 
Medical College. Shimla (M.B.B.S), Dr. Rajendra Prasad Govt. Medical 
ยท College Kangra, Himachal Pradesh Government Dental College and 
Hospital Shimla (B.D.S.). OR Free seats available in various Private 
Dental Colleges and Medical Colleges situated in Himachal Pradesh 
and Rajiv Gandhi Government Ayurvedic College, Paprola should 
have passed atleast two of the following examinations from the 
recognised Schools or Colleges affiliated to ICSE/CBSE and HP Board 
-
NISHANT PURI v. ST A TE 
273 
of School Education or equivalent Boards/University established by A 
law in India. 
(a) Middle or Equivalent. 
(b) Matric or Equivalent. 
(c) 10+2 or Equivalent. 
B 
{ii) The bona fide Himachali students who are admitted to Navodaya 
Schools situated in Himachal Pradesh and who pass Matric or +2 
examination under the exchange programme from other Navodaya 
Schools in the Country shall also be eligible for admission to the C 
above courses. 
(iii) The Wards of Defence personnels/serving Central Government 
employees who are bona fide Himachalis are also exempted from the 
condition of passing two classes from the State of Himachal Pradesh." 
Stated briefly, the relevant facts of the case are as under. 
The appellant herein su

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.