NIMS UNIVERSITY versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 584 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 3 S.C.R. [2022] 3 S.C.R. 584 584 NIMS UNIVERSITY v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (Writ Petition (Civil) No 316 of 2022) MAY 09, 2022 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND SURYA KANT, JJ.] Education/Educational Institutions: Medical admission β Admission to NEET-super specialty courses β Lowering of cut off percentile β Permissibility of β Held: Reduction of the percentile is a matter of academic policy β Super specialty courses cannot be equated with post graduate courses or under graduate admission β Court cannot be unmindful of the fact that Super Specialty courses are at the apex of the academic spectrum β Reasons given by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in declining to reduce the percentile cannot be regarded as extraneous or arbitrary β Thus, writ petition seeking lowering of cut off percentile for admission in NEET Super Speciality courses not interfered with β Constitution of India β Art. 32. Disposing of the writ petition, the Court HELD: 1.1 The question as to whether the percentile should be reduced is a matter of academic policy. The reasons which have weighed with the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in declining to reduce the percentile cannot be regarded as extraneous or arbitrary. Super specialty courses cannot be equated with post graduate courses or for that matter with the percentile fixed for under graduate admission. In the circumstances, it is not possible for this Court to entertain the request of the petitioner by directing a reduction in the percentile. The Court cannot be unmindful of the fact that Super Specialty courses are at the apex of the academic spectrum. If a considered decision is taken not to lower standards by reducing the percentile fixed for eligibility, such a decision cannot be faulted. The reasons furnished are not extraneous or arbitrary. [Para 9][589-E-G] A B C D E F G H 585 1.2 In regard to the alternate prayer, since a second round of counselling has been held at the end of which 940 seats still remain vacant, the Additional Solicitor General has informed the Court that a mop up round of counselling would be held for those seats including for the stray vacancies, while maintaining the eligibility percentile at 50 for the year 2021-2022. [Para 10] [589-H; 590-A] Union of India and others vs. Dinesh Engineering Corpn. and another (2001) 8 SCC 491; Vice-Chairman & Managing director, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. and Another vs. Shishir Realty Private Limited and Ors. Civil Appeal No. 3956-57 of 2017 β referred to. Case Law Reference (2001) 8 SCC 491 referred to Para 42 CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No.316 of 2022. (Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India) P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Prashant Kumar, Aditya Dev Triguna, Ms. Awantika Manohar, M/s Ap & J Chambers, Advs. for the Petitioner. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Aman Sharma, Ms. Srishti Mishra, Manvendra Singh, Ms. Shivika Mehra, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. In these proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek directions (a) for the lowering of the cut off percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses; and (ii) to the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) to conduct a mop up and stray vacancy round of the NEET - Super Specialty counselling to fill up seats which are vacant for the DM/MCh courses. 2. On 5 April 2018, Gazette Notification No MCI-19(I)/2018-Med./ 100818 was issued by the then Medical Council of India in the following terms: NIMS UNIVERSITY v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS A B C D E F G H 586 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 3 S.C.R. βIn order to be eligible for admission to Postgraduate Course for an academic year, it shall be necessary for a candidate to obtain minimum of marks at 50th percentile in the βNational Eligibility- Cum-Entrance Test for Postgraduate coursesβ held for the said academic year. However, in respect of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes, the minimum marks shall be at 40th percentile. In respect of candidates with benchmark disabilities specified under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016, the minimum marks shall be at 45th percentile for General Category and 40th percentile for SC/ST/OBC. The percentile shall be determined on the basis of highest marks secured in the All India Common merit list
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex