LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus RAMESHWAR @ RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIR & ANR.

Citation: [2022] 15 S.C.R. 609 · Decided: 17-11-2022 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: M.R. SHAH · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
609
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
v.
RAMESHWAR @ RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA (DEAD)
THROUGH LEGAL HEIR & ANR.
(Civil Appeal No. 8331-8345 of 2022)
NOVEMBER 17, 2022
[M. R. SHAH AND M. M. SUNDRESH, JJ.]
Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Delay of 22 years in preferring
first appeals – Acquisition notification was issued in 1982 –
Reference court determined compensation at Rs.20 per yard – After
a period of 22 years, land owners filed first appeals – By impugned
judgment, the High Court condoned delay of 22 years and enhanced
the amount of compensation to Rs.149 per sq.yard at par with the
land owners in the case of Deo Karan & Ors. by which this Court
with respect to the acquisition of the year 1982 determined the
compensation at Rs.149/- per sq.yard – Held: The land owners were
rightly held entitled to compensation at Rs.149/- per sq.yard at par
with other land owners whose lands were acquired in the year 1982
– However, submission of the land owners that they are entitled to
compensation @ Rs.297/- per sq.yard relying upon the decision of
this Court in the case of Nanak (Deceased) cannot be accepted as
the land owners had not preferred the appeals before this Court
and it was NOIDA who had filed these appeals – However, to saddle
with the liability to pay statutory benefits and interest for the delayed
period of 22 years upon the  beneficiary/acquiring  body  would
be  a  financial burden upon the public body and it may increase
the project cost which shall be against the public interests –
Therefore, while condoning the delay and enhancing the amount of
compensation at par with other land owners, the High Court ought
not to have saddled the liability upon the appellant to pay statutory
benefits and the interest payable under the Land Acquisition Act,
1894 for the delayed period – To that extent the impugned judgment
is modified.
Partly allowing the appeals, the Court
HELD: 1. The Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued on 05.01.1982. The Reference
[2022] 15 S.C.R. 609
609
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
610
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2022] 15 S.C.R.
Court determined the compensation at Rs.20/- per sq. yard by
impugned judgment. After a period of 22 years, the land owners
preferred the appeals before the High Court. By the impugned
judgment, the High Court after condoning the delay of 22 years
in preferring the appeals has enhanced the amount of
compensation to Rs.149/- per sq.yard at par with the land owners
in the case of Deo Karan & Ors. by which this Court with respect
to the acquisition of the year 1982 determined the compensation
at Rs.149/- per sq.yard. Therefore, in the present case, the land
owners shall be entitled to compensation at Rs.149/- per sq.yard
at par with other land owners whose lands were acquired in the
year 1982. It cannot be disputed that the land owners, whose
lands have been acquired under the provisions of Land Acquisition
Act, 1984, are entitled to a reasonable and just compensation at
par with the other similarly situated land owners. [Para 5][613-
B-D]
2. Now so far as the submission on behalf of the land owners
that they shall be entitled to compensation at the rate of
Rs.297/- per sq.yard relying upon the decision of this Court in
the case of Nanak (Deceased) through LRS. is concerned, at the
outset it is required to be noted that as such the land owners
have not preferred the appeals before this Court. It is the NOIDA
who has preferred the present appeals. Under the circumstances
in the appeals preferred by the NOIDA questioning the
determination of the compensation at Rs.149/-per sq.yard, the
land owners cannot be permitted to say that they are entitled to
the enhanced amount of compensation over and above
Rs.149/- per sq.yard. So far as the land owners are concerned,
the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court
determining and/or awarding the compensation of Rs.149/- per
sq.yard has attained the finality. Even otherwise as rightly
observed by the High Court, the land owners are not entitled to
the compensation at Rs.297/- per sq.yard considering the decision
of this Court in the case of Nanak (Deceased) through LRS. [Paras
5.1, 5.2][613-E-H]
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA)
v. Deo Karan & Ors. decided on 01.05.2018 in Civil
Appeal No.4879 of 2018 – relied on
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
611
Nanak (Deceased) through LRS. v. New OKHLA
Industrial Development Authority and Another (2019)
17 SCC 522 – referred to
3. In the present case,

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.