LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. versus MANJIT KAUR AND ORS.

Citation: [2004] 1 S.C.R. 126 · Decided: 05-01-2004 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: V.N. KHARE · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. 
_.., 
V. 
MANJIT KAUR AND ORS. 
JANUARY 5, 2004 
B 
(V. N. KHARE, CJ. AND S.B. SINHA, J.] 
., 
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988-Motor accident-Driver of vehicle not holding 
{ 
licence-Compensation-Awarded by Tribunal and Co11/ir111ed by High Court 
c with permission to Insurance C:ompany to realize the amount from the driver 
of the vehicle-On appeal, held: In view of the facts of the case orders of 
Courts below justified and need no inference under discretionary jurisdiction-
Constitution of India, 1950-Article 136. 
National Insurance Co. ltd v. Swaran Singh and Ors., 120041 3 SCC 
D 297, relied on. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition (C) No. 
176 of 2004. 
"~ 
IΒ·
From the Judgment andΒ· Order dated 12.12.2002 of the Punjab and 
!!;
E Haryana High Court in F.A.0. No. 5766 of 2002. 
Dr. Kailash Chand (N.P.) for the Petitioner. 
The Judgment of the Cou1t was delivered by 
F 
V. N. KHARE, CJ. This Special Leave Petition is directed against a 
judgment and order dated 12112/2002 passed by the High Court of Punjab 
and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby and whereunder it affirmed the award 
.,. 
passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ropar in Case No. 119 of 
i 
8.12.2000. The question raised in the Special Leave Petition is as to whether 
in view of the finding of the Learned Tribunal that the driver of the Maruti 
G Car was not holding a driving licence and paiticularly when he happened to 
be the owner of the vehicle, the learned Tribunal as well as the High Court 
committed an error in passing the impugned judgment. 
Keeping in view of the fact that both the Tribunal and the High Court 
,A 
had recorded that the Petitioner would be entitled to realise the amount of 
H 
126 
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. 1β€’. MANJIT KAUR [Y. N. KflARE, CJ.] 
127 
compensation as assessed from the driver of the offending vehicle, we do not A 
intend to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the 
Constitution of India, particularly, having regard to our decision in SLP 
(Civil) No. 9027 of 2003, National Insurance Co. ltd. v. Swaran Singh and 
Ors. we do not intend to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction in the matter. 
B 
The Petition is dismissed. 
K.K.T. 
Petition dismissed.