NEIL AURELIO NUNES & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 970 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 1 S.C.R. [2022] 1 S.C.R. 970 970 NEIL AURELIO NUNES & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Writ Petition (C) No. 961 of 2021) JANUARY 07, 2022 [DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND A.S. BOPANNA, JJ.] Education β Reservation β National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET)β Notice issued implementing reservation for OBC (non- creamy layer) and Economically Weaker Section (EWS) categories in the All India Quota (AIQ) seats β Challenge to β Held: A detailed interim order on the applicability of the EWS criteria as notified by OM 2019 for NEET-PG 2021 is necessitated β Validity of the OBC reservation in the AIQ seats in NEET-PG and NEET-UG is upheld β Counselling on the basis of NEET-PG 2021 and NEET-UG 2021 be conducted by giving effect to the reservation as provided by the notice, including the 27 per cent reservation for the OBC category and 10 per cent reservation for EWS category in the AIQ seats β Further, the recommendation of Pandey Committee (formed by Union Government to review the criteria for identifying EWS) that the criteria stipulated in OM 2019 be used for 2021-2022 is accepted β The criteria for the determination of the EWS notified by OM 2019be used for identifying the EWS category for candidates who appeared for NEET-PG 2021 and NEET-UG 2021 examinations β Validity of the criteria determined by the Pandey Committee for identification of EWS would prospectively for the future be subject to the final result of the petitions β Petitions be listed for final hearing on the validity of the EWS criteria as recommended by the Pandey Committee. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (C) No. 961 of 2021. (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) With Writ Petition (C) Nos. 967, 1002, 1021 and 1105 of 2021. Tushar Mehta, SG, K. M. Nataraj, Vikramjit Banerjee, ASGs, V. Krishnamurthy AAG, Arvind Datar, Shyam Divan, P. Wilson, A. A B C D E F G H 971 Mariarputham, Anand Grover, Sr. Advs., Dr. Charu Mathur, Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Rahul Unnikrishnan, Malak Bhatt, Vivek Singh, Shrirang Choudhary, Subodh S. Patil, Chaitanya Deshpande, Ms. Supriya Patil, Kanu Agrawal, Apoorv Kurup, Vatsal Joshi, Shailesh Madiyal, Sugosh Subramaniam, Amrish Kumar, Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Vikas Bansal, Gurmeet Singh Makker, Gaurav Sharma, Kirtiman Singh, Waize Ali Noor, Dhawal Mohan, Prateek Bhatia, Ms. Srirupa Nag, Taha Yasin, R. Nedumaran, Ms. Chandra Priya C., Mukul Lather, Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., V. K. Biju, Ms. Ria Sachthey, Chetanya Singh, Amlendu Kumar Akhilesh Kumar Jha, Shaji George, Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Devashish Bharuka, Ms. Sarvshree, Justine George, Apporve Karol, Mithu Jain, Kartikay Trivedi, Shashank Ratnoo, Vikram Hegde, Shantanu Lakhotia, Kumar Prashant, Ms. Vanya Gupta, Avnish Dave, Parmod Kumar Vishnoi, Varun Thakur, Brajesh Pandey, Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advs. for the appearing parties. The Order of the Court was passed by DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. There is a challenge, in this batch of petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution, to a notice which was issued by the Directorate General of Health Services in the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on 29 July 2021. The notice implements a 27 per cent reservation for Other Backward Classes1 (non-creamy layer) and a 10 per cent reservation for the Economically Weaker Section,2 while filling up 15 per cent undergraduate and 50 per cent post-graduate3 All India Quota4 seats in pursuance of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test5. The notice takes effect from the current admission year, 2021-2022. The petitioners are doctors who appeared in the NEET- PG 2021 examination. 2. The petitions were instituted on 24 August 2021 to challenge the validity of the notice dated 29 July 2021. Notice was issued by this Court on 6 September 2021. The NEET-PG results were announced on 28 September 2021. Arguments were heard in part on 7 October 2021. It was argued that there cannot be any reservation for the OBC and 1 βOBCβ 2 βEWSβ 3 βPGβ 4 βAIQβ 5 βNEETβ NEIL AURELIO NUNES v. UNION OF INDIA A B C D E F G H 972 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 1 S.C.R. EWS category in the AIQ seats in NEET-PG and that the criteria for the determination of the EWS category notified by O.M 36039/1/20196 was unconstitutional. By an order dated 21 October 2021, this Court sought clarifications in regard to the criteria provided by the OM of 2019 of using Rs 8 lakhs as the cut - off income limit for identifying EWS. Two weeks
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex