LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus RAM KALI AND ORS.

Citation: [2004] 1 S.C.R. 176 · Decided: 05-01-2004 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: V.N. KHARE, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, S.B. SINHA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. 
v. 
RAM KALI AND ORS. 
JANUARY 5, 2004 
B 
(V. N. KHARE, CJ., D.M. DHARMADHIKARI AND 
S.B. SINHA, JJ.] 
'f ' 
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988-Motor accident-Claim for compensation-
c 
Compensation awarded by Tribunal despite holding that terms and conditions 
of insurance policy violated at the time of accident-High Court confirming 
the award despite holding that driving licence of driver of vehicle was fake-
Special leave petition before Supreme Court-Held: Order of courts below 
need no interference as in awarding compensation they had exercised discretion 
in favour of the claimant-Constitution of India, 1950-Article 136. 
D 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Special Leave Petition (C) No. 
9065 of 2.003. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 20. I 2.2002 of the Punjab and 
Haryana High Court in F.A.O. No. 5942 of 2002. 
E 
Pannanand Gaur for the Petitioner. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered 
., 
This Special Leave Petition is directed against a judgment and order 
F dated 20th December, 2002 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana 
at Chandigarh whereby and whereunder the appeal filed by the petitioner 
-... 
herein questioning an award dated 6-9-2002 made by Motor Accident Claims 
• 
Tribunal, Fatehabad was dismissed. The High Court has dismissed the 
aforementioned appeal inter a/ia on the ground that the driving licence of 
the offending vehicle had been found to be fake. The learned Tribunal, 
G however, arrived at the finding of fact that the first respondent herein has 
violated the terms and conditions of the insurance policy by plying the Maruti 
Van on hire/i-eward at the time of accident-. 
Y' 
The said question, it appears from the impugned judgment of the High 
H 
Court, was not adverted to before it. 
176 
> 
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. RAM KALI 
177 
In view of the fact that both the Tribunal and the High Court had A 
exercised their discretion in favour of the claimant. We do not intend to 
exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article l 36 of the Constitution 
of India. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. No costs. 
K.K.T. 
Petition dismissed.