NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
•'' - NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN A v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. OCTOBER 15, 1999 [DR. A.S. ANAND, CJ., S.P. BHARUCHA AND B.N. KIRPAL, JJ.] B Contempt of Courts Act, I 971 : Contempt of Court-Interim order passed by Supreme Court with regard to Height of Dam on river Narmada-Application filed by State of Gujarat C stating that leaders of Narmada Bachao Ando/an had been reacting to order passed by this Court by way of threat of protests, public meetings, undertaking Satyagrahas, news reports, press releases, articles in news magazines etc.- Objectionable passages in a book also brought to notice of the Court-Held, NBA and its leaders have knowingly made comments on pending proceedings D and have· prim a facie disobeyed interim injunctions passed by this Court- Prima facie the threats held out by NBA and its leaders also appear to be an attempt to prejudice or interfere with due course of judicial proceedings- Comments on matters connected with the case made in the book by its author are prima facie a misrepresentation of the proceedings in this Court-Freedom of speech and expression does not include freedom to distort orders of the E Court and present incomplete and a one sided picture deliberately, which has the tendency to scandalise the Court and bring it into disrepute Qd ridicule-The relevant passages in the book have the tendency to create prejudice against this Court-However, keeping in view the importance of the issue of resettlement and rehabilitation of PAFs, which this Court has F been monitoring, the Court is not inclined to initiate contempt proceedings against NBA, its leaders and the author concerned-It is hoped that these persons would desist from acting in a manner which has the tendency to interfere with the due course of administration of justice or which violates the injunctions issued by this Court from time to time-Constitution of India, Article I 29. G CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (C) No. 319 of 1994; I.A. No. 14 of 1999. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) 5 H A B 6 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1999] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. K.K. Venugopal, (A.C.), Shanti Bhushan, Ashok H. Desai, T.R. Andhyarujina, (Sushi! Kumar Jain) Additional Advocate General of Rajasthan, Guru Krishna Kumar, Prashant Bhushan, Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Pallav Sisodia, Tufail A. Khan, P. Parmeshwaran, B.V. Bairam Das, Ms. H. Wahi, D.M. Nargolkar, S.K. Agnihotri, A. Mishra and Ms. Anjali Doshi for the appearing parties. The following Orders of the Court were delivered: DR. A.S. ANAND, C.J. This petition has been filed by the State of Gujarat bringing to the notice of the Court how the petitioner-Narmada Bachao Andolan-had been reacting to the interim order of this Court .t C permitting the increase of the height of the dam to RL 85 meters and about the threats of protests, public meetings and of undertaking Satyagrahas etc., on account of that order. Reference is made particularly to the interview of Ms. Medha Patkar which appeared in the Hindustan Times of 27.6.1999 and some other newspaper reports and press releases issued by the petitioner. D E F G Our attention has also been drawn to an article which appeared in the Weekly News Magazine 'Outlook' and to some portions ofa Book titled "The Greater Common Good" by Ms. Arundhati Roy. 0 On 22nd July, 1999, we made the following order : " At the outset, our attention has been drawn to certain statements, press releases, interviews, etc., given by the petitioners themselves or by sorr.e others under the aegis of the petitioner-Narmada Bachao Andolan. Copies of some of those statements, etc., have been filed along with I.A. No. 14 by the State of Gujarat. Our attention has also been drawn to an article in the weekly news ·magazine "Outlook" dated May 24, 1999 under the title "The Greater Common Good" by Ms. Arundhati Roy. A book under the same title, i.e., "The Greater Common Good" by Arundhati Roy, which appears to have been dedicated to "The Narmada, and all the life she sustains and Shripad, Nandini, Sylvie, Alok, Medha, Baba Amte and their colleagues in the NBA", has also been brought to our notice. We have gone through the statements, the press releases, the H article and certain portions of the book referred to above. Prima.Jacie NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN v. U.0.1. 7 ' it appears to us that there is a deliberate attempt to undermine the A ~- dignity of the Court and to influence the course of just
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex