LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

NARESH KUMAR & ANR. versus THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

Citation: [2024] 3 S.C.R. 740 · Decided: 12-03-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: SUDHANSHU DHULIA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

* Author
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 740 : 2024 INSC 196
Naresh Kumar & Anr. 
v.  
The State of Karnataka & Anr.
(Criminal Appeal No. 1510 of 2024)
12 March 2024
[Sudhanshu Dhulia* and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Refusal by High Court to quash criminal proceedings against 
Appellants/Accused arising out of a civil transaction between 
Appellants and Respondent No.2, if justified.
Headnotes
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Powers of the 
High Court under – Quashing of FIR filed by Respondent 
No.2 against Appellants – Appellants, employees of a 
bicycle manufacturing company engaged Respondent No.2 
for assembling, transporting and delivering bicycles – 
Respondent No.2 aggrieved by the fact of payment not being 
commensurate with the service rendered - FIR filed under 
Sections 406, 420, 506, Indian Penal Code – Subsequently, 
settlement arrived at between the parties – Appellants paid 
an additional amount of INR 26,00,000/- to Respondent No.2 
as full and final settlement, duly accepted by Respondent 
No.2 – Payment and receipt of settlement amount not 
disputed by parties – Chargesheet filed against Appellants 
– Appellants sought quashing of the FIR and proceedings 
arising therefrom under Section 482, CrPC on the ground of 
the dispute being civil in nature – Respondent No.2 objected 
to settlement on the ground of it being vitiated by coercion 
– High Court’s refusal to exercise powers under Section 
482, CrPC on the ground of a prima facie case being made 
out – Challenged:
Held: Section 482 empowers High Court to prevent abuse of 
process and secure ends of justice – Though the power under 
Section 482 should be exercised sparingly, the High Court 
must not hesitate in quashing criminal proceedings which are 
essentially of a civil nature – Judgement in Paramjeet Batra 
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 
741
Naresh Kumar & Anr. v.  State of Karnataka 
v. State of Uttarakhand (2013) 11 SCC 673 relied upon – 
Reference to observations in Randheer Singh v. State of U.P. 
(2021) 14 SCC 626 regarding misuse of criminal proceedings as 
a weapon of harassment and also Usha Chakraborty & Anr. 
v. State of West Bengal & Anr. 2023 SCC OnLine SC 90 for 
exercise of the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 
482 to quash civil disputes cloaked in criminal offence – High 
Court erred in holding that a prima facie case was made out based 
on the ground that Appellants’ intention to cheat Respondent 
No.2 from the beginning was evident from the fact that the 
Appellants had cumulatively paid Respondent No.2 an amount 
much higher than what the latter was entitled to receive for the 
services rendered by him – Additional amount paid in light of the 
settlement, cannot be presumed as an act of cheating – Nature 
of dispute in present case is civil and allegation of a coerced 
settlement is unlikely – No FIR or Complaint by Respondent 
No.2 alleging coercion, amount also duly accepted by him – 
Mere breach of contract would not attract criminal prosecution in 
every case, Sarabjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and Anr. (2023) 
5 SCC 360 relied upon – Every breach of contract would not 
amount to cheating and it must be proved that fraudulent or 
dishonest intention to cheat existed while making the promise, 
as held in Vesa Holdings (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala, (2015) 8 
SCC 293 – Present dispute was not only civil in nature but also 
stood settled subsequently – In the instant case, no criminal 
element present, only an abuse of process – Impugned Order 
of the High Court set aside – FIR and criminal proceedings 
quashed – Appeal allowed. [Para 4-8]
Case Law Cited
Paramjeet Batra v. State of Uttarakhand (2013) 11 SCC 
673; Sarabjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and Anr. (2023) 
5 SCC 360; Vesa Holdings (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala 
[2015] 4 SCR 27 : (2015) 8 SCC 293 - relied on.
Randheer Singh v. State of U.P. (2021) 14 SCC 626, 
Usha Chakraborty & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Anr. 
2023 SCC OnLine SC 90 – referred to.
List of Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Penal Code, 1860.
742
[2024] 3 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Quashing of FIR; Inherent powers of the High Court; Criminal 
case arising from civil dispute; Inherent powers; Criminal breach 
of trust; Cheating; Settlement; Compromise.
Case Arising From
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No.1510 
of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 02.12.2020 of the High Court 
of Karnataka at Bengaluru in CRLP No.8003 of 2019
Appearance

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.